Thoughts on the Vote Fraud in New Hampshire
Brandon Dean
January 11, 2008
Well, I have a few thoughts on the obvious vote fraud which has taken place in New Hampshire. This is directed at everyone, but especially those of you who have been struggling for truth for years now.
To those of you who finally started to see what all of us "kooks" have been screaming about for years since you've discovered Ron Paul in the last year or so, who have seen the truth in what Ron Paul says about government corruption, and have then witnessed the blacklisting of this one honest politician amongst a heap of drooling sycophants who call themselves the "media:" welcome to our world... We have been trying to wake folks like you up and it's been very difficult. Not so much to get through to folks logically, but to get people to care about something.
Something akin to the Ron Paul Revolution was necessary to wake a greater mass of people out of their apathy. We as strugglers for truth must not lose sight of what the greater power of this revolution is: loss of this apathy. it's more powerful than a presidency. Far more. When there is a massive wave of caring awareness, those abusing this system will scurry for cover for fear of exposure. As it stands, our system has been thwarted to award villainy.
To those of you who have been around longer than this last year: did you think the establishment would not do everything in its power to deflect Dr. Paul? Of course you knew, but like me you probably watched the first caucus and primary amid some vague dream outstretched in hope that just maybe it would be (somewhat) fair. Perhaps the powers-that-be should have considered changing Dr. Paul's 5th place status from Iowa to New Hampshire in the interest of succeeding at their farce?
In an unbelievable episode, the town of Sutton, New Hampshire, reported 0 votes for Dr. Paul. When a local Sutton family realized they had all voted for Ron Paul (5 total votes) yet NONE of these votes appeared on the official chart provided by Associated Press to all the networks, the information reached one Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org. Bev Harris proceeded to call Sutton officials, who "discovered" that 31 votes had been cast for Ron Paul, but had "accidentally" been shuffled off to the "other" pool, and said they would "fix" it right away. I never saw any change in the charts however...
Hillary Clinton, the smoke-breathing demon-clone of Bill Clinton (who deserves A LOT more ire than he gets), also stole her win from Barack Obama, the CFR frontman whose wife is the head of the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. This alone tells me the man is a globalist, besides the fact that he's a Democrat. Whatever; he was cheated and it ain't right. Entrance Straw Polls barely ever miss by 2 percent, but water turned to wine that night for Shillary Clinton. Somehow she turned a definite 14 point loss into a 10 point win! Miracle of miracles! Black became white (pun intended), up became down, and war became peace all in one night, and the sun didn't snuff out! Nope, the machinery of Media barely noticed. A few "wows" and "what the's" and voila! it's on to South Carolina! Woo Hoo!!
All of this is grievous and horrendously surprising to those who have discovered the gift of utter government corruption in the last year. It's unbelievable! WTF is going on? OMG!!! I am not ROTF right now!
To the rest of us, who probably know that every presidential election since 1960 has been a fraud, this better not surprise you. Time for a moment of tough love: Snap out of it! Stop living in a dream world! Even if Dr. Paul was elected somehow, how long do you think he'd last in office unless he completely compromised? And never forget lest ye are tempted to think of how long Kennedy lasted with delusions of grandeur: Kennedy was blackmailed. BOBBY Kennedy was incorruptible. John was corruptible, even though he remains our last true president, because he stopped letting himself be blackmailed and went to war with these vicious blood-thirsty monsters. So did Bobby, and he didn't even make it to the White House. It was in my hometown of Los Angeles, California that he was gunned down in front of dozens of witnesses after he won the 1968 California Democratic Primary.
But here is the good news: Ron Paul has already accomplished what he originally set out to accomplish, that which is more powerful than a presidency: the corrosion of apathy. God bless his soul for what he has done to wake people in this country up.
And if the elections are totally faked, and if Dr. Paul never gets close to the Oval Office, I say the more likely the chances of this young movement surviving its infancy. If Dr. Paul starts winning all the primaries, and they see no alternative but to kill him, will this freedom movement go the way of Bobby Kennedy's? Will the Ron Paul Revolution morph into a small little group of frothing violent-minded revolutionaries, completely missing the point of Paul's message? Will it just fade completely, like a beautiful song lost in a strong wind? I believe that is the strongest possibility, sadly enough.
But if Dr. Paul loses through fraud and corruption, proving out everything he's been saying, the only thing that will happen is he will gain more followers.
I cannot express my admiration of Dr. Paul for what he is doing for all of us. He has become one of the great American Heroes, and he deserves a seat next to Andrew Jackson, and Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Samuel Adams, Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, and too many others to mention.
To have watched Dr. Paul's speeches in congress for years, to have written him letters to run for president at least four times in the last ten years, to have read his financial exposes and speeches, and then to see how huge his candidacy has become is a miracle I truly never expected to see. What has happened so far has so far exceeded my expectations because I, like Dr. Paul, had underestimated the malcontent of the American people. I am in awe of his support. The man has already won! The message is out! It's now far too late for the New World Order and I'm not sure if they realize it yet...
Friday, January 11, 2008
Thoughts on the Vote Fraud in New Hampshire
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
thus always to tyrants authors
Brandon Dean (splitbabyniblet)
FranG
Joshua Berry (tattoogeek)
19 comments:
So now what?
I have contributed to the money bombs, only to see that the votes will never be counted fairly. Why waste my time and money running a fool's errand?
We need immediate election reform before any more primaries. We need injunctive relief from the use of any more computerized ballot counting.
Will that happen? Not likely.
Is our government legitimate?
No.
Are people, by law, required to pay taxes to an illegitimate "government?"
What would happen if everybody increased the number of exemptions that their employer uses to figure tax withholding until nothing is withheld?
What would happen if those same people then stopped filing tax returns?
Great post, but you may want to reconsider Lincoln in that pantheon you listed. After hearing Paul's answer to Russert about the Civil War being unnecessary, I bought the Dilorenzo book The Real Lincoln.
It completely smashed throught the false image we have been taught about that President.
Otherwise, spot on bro!
McCain was the recipient of the NH vote fraud. He's also utttered racist remarks during the SC debate which MSM continues to ignore. John McCain's racism in SC, read it here:
McCain racist in SC debate
Unfortunately it took segregationist Governor Wallace to reveal the truth that "there's not a dime's worth of difference between" Republicans and Democrats. The Democrats willingly went along with the War in Iraq, suspension of Habeas Corpus, detaining protesters, banning books like America Deceived (book) from Amazon, stealing private lands (Kelo decision), warrant-less wiretapping and refusing to investigate 9/11 properly. They are both guilty of treason.
Support Dr. Ron Paul and save this great nation.
to respond to the comment about lincoln, I'm glad you brought it up. It's ironic, because I almost did not include Lincoln for a number of reasons. he most certainly was not perfect. I have not read that book, but I have read plenty to question his authenticity. I've read a document which was an order by lincoln to assassinate an entire indian tribe who would not comply with his orders.
my reason for including him is two-fold. first, because of greenbacks, which stayed in circulation until the 1990's, an amazing accomplishment being that greenbacks were completely fiat, yet healthy for the economy.
secondly, because he saved the union. he made it perfectly clear he wasn't in the war to free the slaves, he wanted to save the union. the rothschilds of europe were funding england and france to invade and occupy the newly torn apart union. lincoln knew this, and so did the russian czar at the time. the russian czar actually sent navy fleets to new york and san francisco and openly declared an attack on the US was an attack on russia. this is why the british army, stationed in canada, and the french army, which had invaded and was occupying mexico, did not invade... I believe lincoln was one of the few presidents to see the big picture, no matter the mistakes he made or the beliefs he held.
I could say the same thing about andrew jackson...
how much more are the land of the free and home of the brave going to put up with.i live in australia and it makes me annoyed that you lot are the leaders of the so called free world and not only are you being robbed but so are the rest of us.there's not much i can do in oz,i am a minority i don't watch the comedy hour(msm news),stop getting robbed and do us all a favour.hang the bastads.go safe.
I agree, I don't know how you could list a demon like Lincoln. He did have much in common with bush. I guess many of us are still not quiet awakened to the truth on many subjects,and I can see you are very ignorant about this man.
truthseeker, refer to my last response about lincoln. I'm sorry if you think I'm "quiet ignorant" about the man, but I'm afraid it's the opposite. thanks for the (non) history lesson, however...
"he saved the union"
it amuses me to watch the glee with which some in the US received and encouraged* the break-up of the USSR and much of Eastern Europe.
this from a country which prides itself on having settled a neighbourhood dispute by "freeing the slaves".
it would be interesting to see how the US would balkanize.
*see the faff-a-minnit Charly Wilson
The media is so sure of its slanted propaganda that it brazenly does a black out on Dr. Ron Paul. It is good to see the younger generations wake up to the fact that Dr. Ron Paul is telling the truth.
We can only beat vote fraud by each state writing to their party chairmen and insist that vote counting is done first, in the precincts before going off to a central counting house.
There seems to be some huge blind spots among Ron Paul supporters.
Ron Paul does not believe vote fraud happened in New Hampshire. He has offically stated this. He is unwilling to support any recount effort.
Ron Paul does not think that impeachment is his responsibility. He thinks it's the job of "the other party"
And lastly, Ron Paul has stated that 9/11 truthers are "bizarre" & that he has "abandoned" any viewpoint on 9/11 that includes ANY government complicity.
I say "wake up" to Ron Paul supporters & to Michael Rivero @ WRH. Hold all politicians to the same standards, or be hypocrites.
Get it right. It's ELECTION Fraud, not VOTE Fraud.
Voter fraud in NH didn't wake me up. 9/11 woke me up.
vote (vt)
n.
1.
a. A formal expression of preference for a candidate for office or for a proposed resolution of an issue.
b. A means by which such a preference is made known, such as a raised hand or a marked ballot.
fraud (frôd)
n.
1. A deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain.
2. A piece of trickery; a trick.
e·lec·tion (-lkshn)
n.
1.
a. The act or power of electing.
b. The fact of being elected.
umm, it's not vote fraud, it's "election fraud?" what the hell are you talking about? hahaha
I've come to prefer "vote counting fraud", no room for mis-interpretation ;-)
"I've come to prefer "vote counting fraud", no room for mis-interpretation ;-)"
haha ok it's a deal...
Response to JV:
1. "Ron Paul does not believe vote fraud happened in New Hampshire. He has offically stated this. He is unwilling to support any recount effort."
Ron Paul has to say this. The MSM attacks everything he says, so if he compalined of vote-fraud, they'd have a field day. He doesn't want to get stalled on past history.
2. "Ron Paul does not think that impeachment is his responsibility. He thinks it's the job of "the other party"."
Same as #1 - he has to stay away from red-flag topics, especially ones off track from his basic message of liberty, freedom, & fiscal responsibility.
3. Ron Paul has stated that 9/11 truthers are "bizarre" & that he has "abandoned" any viewpoint on 9/11 that includes ANY government complicity."
Same as #1 & #2.
4. "I say "wake up" to Ron Paul supporters & to Michael Rivero @ WRH. Hold all politicians to the same standards, or be hypocrites."
Whaaattt? Ron Paul is The Most Intelligent and Honest politician amongst a slew of hack personality politicians - he discusses present issues, problems and solutions. Mike Rivero on WRH is The Most Intelligent informational site on the Internet.
It is NOT Ron Paul or WRH supporters who have the 'blind spots'.
Hey! Thanks for reading & replying.
Yes, it is obvious that the media will attack Ron Paul. They are already doing it at every opportunity, so what does he have to lose? I think taking it further would get him even more support. His exposing of media bias certainly get's him some points, but to say he cannot mention something because he would be attacked in the media is strange.
Paul has often successfully spoken about "hot button" issues. So if he chooses not to address an issue there must be some other reason. The "hot button" excuse doesn't seem valid, never stopped him before.
When people use words like "most" (or "only") they usually wind up stating a fallacy. Although I'll grant that Paul could possibly be the most [whatever] politician, that's not really a compliment. It's on par with saying someone is an honorable pedophile. See? He's a politican. He's playing "politics".
Believe me, I've heard all the excuses already. I would also like to remind people that their ARE candidates outside of the Demorats & Repugs. Paul's supporters have done more to scare the establishment than he will. I suspect he is intended to sap/divert the energy of well intentioned people. Hope I'm wrong because being right is rarely comforting.
There was a lengthy discussion of Paul's illogical stance/actions on Vote Counting Fraud, Impeachment & 9/11 Truth over here: http://911blogger.com/node/13334
Peace, be smart
In reference to peaceful protests, How many more peaceful protests are necessary before you realize they don't work. They are in my opinion a close relative of Apathy itself.
You really believe that even if we get millions of people to set around singing cum by ya that it's gonna make a difference?
I assume you respect the founders of this country so I would remind you that if they would have sat around singing cum by ya then we never would have had the rights that we are currently trying to regain.
I don't understand your logic and Peace is not possible if you want to make any head way whatsoever. If Paul isn't elected and the people still set on their asses singing cum by ya, I'll be taking what I have and moving as far away from civilization as possible and practice personal freedom in solitude until the rest of you people wake up and take a stand.
It's all or nothing.
ok, "anonymous" who said anything about protesting? a popular movement does not require sitting around a campfire in front of the white house singing girl scout songs.
a popular movement does not require unrestrained violence, and the american revolution was no unrestrained. it took them years to get people to agree with them that their LAST RESORT was to fight the british. THEY COULDN'T HAVE DONE IT WITHOUT A POPULIST MOVEMENT OF THE PEOPLE, SMART GUY. there was a great wave of awareness that swept the country, and they acted upon it.
is violence always useless. of course not. and I never said that.
I'm afraid you've assumed too much about me. I am no pacifist. in fact, I'm a member of the Militia of California, smart guy...
now, why don't you go out in the woods to solve the problems of society. that'll do it! great answer! just run away from all our problems, so they can pick us off one by one as the sweep the countryside. that's a great solution, and so original!! great job!
better yet, if you think violence is the only answer, why don't you just start taking fools out right now? what are you waiting for?
oh yeah, you're not in the "woods" yet. so when are you leaving? you still got some keyboard battles to fight? you just can't seem to leave them internets, huh? society too convenient for you?
why are you still here?
Post a Comment