the american revolutionary war was never truly won, because it hasn't truly ended...
by brandon dean
As in every other instance of digging through history to gain the clearest view possible of what might have actually transpired, we find some very interesting anomalies and proofs of things we may have expected all along. History records that the Revolutionary War was won through a feat of arms, yet international occult bankers have never ceased their attack on this country. If only the average person would become interested in the economic history of how this idea of a free republic was maligned from the beginning, they would see why bankers and multinational corporations are blamed for everything... Yet there were genuine heroes who fought these ideas of central power, black magic occultism and money manipulation, and they won many battles and lost many battles. The history of the united States has been a back and forth struggle between those who care about freedom (but have never really seemed to recognize the true demon overseeing everything) and those who wish to save themselves by enslaving the rest. Freedom is a constantly upward struggle, and it hurts sometimes as much as exhilarates...
In article 5 it states: "It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his Majesty's arms and who have not borne arms against the said United States."
So the people who had just won the war were responsible by treaty for paying restitution to the crown and to "real British subjects" for the property they were seizing due to a war of independence! Unbelievable!
to read the text of the Treaty of Paris, click here
"I have heard much of the nefarious, and dangerous plan, and doctrines of the Illuminati," Washington declares. Despite accusations that Washington was a high-level Freemason, he denied that he was currently "...Presiding over the English lodges in this Country. The fact is, I preside over none, nor have I been in one more than once or twice, within the last thirty years. I believe notwithstanding, that none of the Lodges in this Country are contaminated with the principles ascribed to the Society of the Illuminati."
The Revolutionary War hadn't even subsided before the bankers had their backup plans for control set in motion. Washington had "heard much" about the Illuminati plan, and even wrote of them by name. To deny either their very existence or their attempted (and I believe accomplished) overthrow of Freemasonry is futile. This is a scan of the original letter:
To view the letter full size, click here
Rothschild wanted Britain to reconquer the united States, bringing back control of the colonies and their money supplies to British bankers such as himself. He is quoted as saying "Either the application for renewal of the Charter [of the first bank] is granted, or the United States will find itself in a most disastrous war."
The charter was not renewed, and Rothschild was quoted as telling the English parliament: "teach these impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to Colonial status."
The English army then invaded the US, and even sacked Washington DC, destroying many of our original legal documents. In 1814, the Second Bank of the United States was created, which lasted its twenty year charter until President Andrew Jackson destroyed it too...
It sure seems like whether Rothschild actually said those things or not, the war of 1812 was highly profitable for private bankers.
Discussion about the Civil War tends to revolve around slavery in the mainstream history, and Abraham Lincoln's faults in the alternative press. It is absolutely true that Abraham Lincoln cared not at all about slavery in terms of the Civil War. His primary drive was to preserve the union. In fact, at one point Lincoln proclaimed "My paramount objective is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it."
An early collaboration between English cotton merchants and cotton growers of the southern states had developed since the Revolution, and the international bankers saw this as the weak point in America's defenses. They used this financially important relationship to start the Civil War.
Industrialists in the north had passed protective tariffs which blocked European goods from reaching the south, forcing the south to buy Northern goods. European interests were angry, and cut off cotton imports from the south. The south was screwed. These were the outward reasons, but in reality the protective tariffs served international bankers, who were not happy about how Andrew Jackson had destroyed their private central bank 25 years before. They used these tensions to cause more tension than there already was between north and south.
Lincoln knew the bankers were behind the whole thing, or at least he eventually realized this. When he realized England and France had troops stationed along the northern and southern borders of the US and were poised to invade at the right moment, when the north was at its weakest, Lincoln sent a letter begging help from Czar Alexander of Russia.
Upon receiving this letter, the czar proclaimed "Before we open this paper or know its contents, we grant any request it may contain." That's how highly Alexander thought of Lincoln...
Without even taking the time to reply to the letter, the Russian Navy showed up in both New York Harbor and San Francisco Bay and the czar announced that any attack against the United States should be considered an attack on Russia herself! This saved the united States, like Lafayette of France had during the Revolutionary War.
The 14th Amendment to our Constitution is fondly remembered by history as the act that "freed the slaves," yet what the act truly accomplished was to have blacks sign over their lives to become "United States Citizens," a legal term created to give privileges, not rights, to freed slaves. If a freed slave wanted to own a gun, he had to go get a permit, or he had to get a license to marry a white woman, etc. It took a while, but eventually most Americans were fooled into signing their lives away in similar fashion. This is why you need a license or permit to do anything it seems nowadays.
The first sentence of the 14th Amendment says it all, if you know what you're reading legally:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Thus, if you are "subject" (a slave) to the jurisdiction of the United States, then you are a citizen. A slave had to agree to being SUBJECT to the United States to become a citizen!! and guess what? SO DO YOU!
To read the text of the 14th amendment, go here
It also opened the floodgates for the US Code, which codifies the tyranny legalized by the 14th Amendment and the Act 1871.
To read the Act of 1871, also referred to as the "Ku Klux Klan Act,"go here
You don't want to read the US Code (it's pure crap) so I won't link to it, but it's easy enough to find with a google search.
This war against our free spirit is coming to a head in modern times, as our burgeoning awareness clashes with their methodical oppression. The same old battle ever fought, there are no higher stakes for mankind. We must overcome and maintain our freedoms.
In the same way that the free spirit is part of nature, and cannot be destroyed, it's time for us to face up to the fact that the same is true of the spirit of malice. It will not disappear in any foreseeable future, so we might as well just buck up and face it, and keep facing it.
A cowardly brute will take from you what you will give freely, but the moment you decide to stop giving and face the brute head on is the moment the cowardly brute questions himself, to your advantage...
copyright Brandon Dean, 2008