Senator Joe Biden: "You Don't Have to be a Jew to be a Zionist." and other crap...

"Senator" Joe Biden is interviewed by Shalom TV, and explains why he is a Zionist. Not only that, but he mentions he has a reason for "going easy" on Jonathan Pollard, the ISRAELI WHO STOLE NATIONAL SECRETS AND SOLD THEM TO THE ISRAELIS. So....... why would this spy deserve leniency? Well, Biden never quite reaches the point of explaining that. Must be because he's Jewish... How special!
He says you don't need to be a Jew to be a Zionist, and he's certainly correct about that! In fact, you CAN'T be a Jew and a Zionist at the same time. Why? Because the original cause of Zionism was to fight for a "Jewish State," which they now have, and the present cause has nothing to do with Judaism, only the furthering of the STATE of Israel, not the state of Judaism...
Zionists stopped trusting in God out of impatience. The Torah specifically states GOD will give the Jews a homeland when GOD is ready, not when the Atheist Zionists who represent Judaism lose patience. Let's not even talk about the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who have died because morons believe it's their homeland when the Palestinians are the remnants of the Canaanites, whom the original Hebrews originally slaughtered two thousand years ago when they stole their homeland the first time.
Zionism is almost precisely the opposite of Judaism, in that it promotes man as having more wisdom and foresight than the ultimate power in the universe, God...
Anyway, without further ado, here is Senator Joe Biden:

"I am a Zionist. You don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist..." Wow...

The Wizard of Oswald, Part III: The Dawning of the Self-Policed State

'The Sun Also Rises' on a World of Political Correctness, Invasion of Privacy, Rightism, and Leftism...
Brandon Dean
Thus Always to Tyrants
August 22nd, 2008

Political Correctness and the Soft-bellied Confusionists

Political correctness is possibly the most debilitating social epidemic in America today. It can cause one to literally deny the truth in front of his face, and to even hate oneself...
I had to go to a courthouse in Los Angeles yesterday, and an incident there provoked this writing. A friend of mine gave me a ride to the Van Nuys Courthouse, and we parked down the street a little after attempting to park in a CITY parking lot (which insanely cost 3 dollars for every twenty minutes, not to exceed 20 dollars... Wow, what a deal!) We backed out of the parking lot and parked at a meter directly in front of the lot for twenty five cents. The parking lot was empty. Gee... Maybe they should lower the price so people will actually park there. But we all know government cannot LOWER prices of any kind for any reason, due of course to the inflation created by their failed policies...
Anyhow, as we parked, we noticed two Hispanic women, both in their mid-twenties, arguing in a car across the street. They were screaming at each other, and the first thing I saw was the passenger throw the driver's keys onto the street. Further screaming ensued, while I told my friend to enjoy the show as I headed toward the courts. As I was walking away, I heard one of the women scream "you better let my baby go" about four or five times. I stopped and looked over. The two women were standing outside the car, with a small child inside. The child was obviously in no danger, and the two women looked like sisters having a normal argument that was perhaps a little crazy, but not violent. They were certainly embarrassing themselves acting like children, but I decided it was none of my business, and continued on my way.
My friend however--let's call her Ms. X--was waiting in the car for me, and was basically stuck with a front row seat. As I was walking away, a red sedan pulled up and stopped next to the two womens' car. In it was a middle aged woman and her two adolescent kids. I noticed the lady get out of the car and head toward the "situation," but I kept walking.
After I was done in court, when I came back to the car, Ms. X told me the story I missed. Apparently, the lady who pulled up and parked got out of her car and started screaming at the two arguing women in a bizarre attempt to "settle" the situation. Both women who had originally been arguing turned their anger towards the stranger, who began calling them motherfuckers and cunts and all that. The screaming continued for a minute or two, then Ms. X felt the need to get out of her car and diffuse the situation herself.
Ms. X crossed the street, and calmly mediated the situation by asking the newcomer how she was going to calm the whole thing down by screaming and further inflaming it. This started a whole new barrage of profanities from the crazy lady (who also had kids in her car), this time directed at Ms. X. She kept saying things like "you have no right to interfere" to Ms. X, when she herself had interfered! She demanded that her two children use their cell phones to call the police (there was a police station about two hundred yards from the incident...). She finally got on one of the phones and called someone, describing Ms. X as a "bitch" who interfered and screwed up "her" situation. Crazy, right?
Well, Ms. X did calm the situation, the two apparent sisters thanked her, and they went about their day... The crazy lady could not live with the fact that she couldn't diffuse the situation, yet this new "bitch" (Ms. X) could. None of the parties involved could understand why this lady was so concerned. She really seemed in need of help herself. Then the truth finally came out.
While arguing with Ms. X, she proclaimed the reason she had a right to interfere in these two people's lives: she was a SOCIAL WORKER who worked with children!!! hahaha Amazing! There are so many things wrong with that I don't know where to begin.
But let's start with the politically correct dreamworld this person lives in. She actually not only views it as her responsibility, but her "right" as a social worker, to interfere in someone's life if she feels a child is in danger. First of all, there is no legal precedent for a stupid social worker to use any police powers WHATSOEVER. Second of all, no child was being abused. People argue every god damn day, even in front of children (oh my GOD!!). Did she think the police were going to show up and throw these two women in jail for yelling at each other? She really did!!! Literally amazing...
Years of politically correct brainwashing have led this lady to the ridiculous conclusion that any adults screaming at each other in the presence of a child are abusing that child. Even more ridiculous is the fact that she made the situation FAR worse by interfering, cursing, screaming and threatening than the two women ever would have. The ironic and funny thing is that, when I got down to the court building, there was a sheriff's deputy watching the whole event from about a hundred yards away. So while this idiot has her kids on the phone to 911, pleading with passers-by to hang up their phones and also call the police (!!!!!), there is a cop right down the street who obviously saw the whole thing, and decided like me it was none of his business. And it wasn't...

It may be uncouth, unappealing, and moronic to scream at your sister in public, but there is no law against it, even if-GOD FORBID!!--there's a small child in attendance. Only the war against the American middle class can explain this social behavior called political correctness.

The self policed state rears its ugly head in many ways. By means of example, the once dominant race in this country (white protestants) has been mainly reduced to soft-bellied confusionists who vote against and even believe contrary to their own best interests out of self-guilt...

Manufactured Racism: the Catalyst for a Race War

I grew up learning all about how my white-skinned ancestors abused and killed the African slaves who were brought here by my ancestors against their will. I wasn't told that the white slave trade was just as prevalent as the black slave trade until the invention of the cotton gin. And I also wasn't told that an Irish slave was worth a tenth of the price of an African slave, and that was the real reason the South chose African slaves: they were simply bigger, stronger, and more compliant. The Irish slave was not only smaller and weaker, but he organized with his fellow Irishmen to break out or revolt, and would, at every opportunity, malign his "owner."
Simple economics. The African slaves could be (generally) trusted not to rebel. The Irish could not. Not to mention it was a whole lot easier to find a black slave amid a white population than an Irish...
I was also never told that there were BLACK SLAVE OWNERS from the South, and not just a few of them. They certainly were not the majority, but they also certainly existed. Not only that, but where did all the African slaves come from in the first place? Africans sold them to the white slave merchants, who transported them across the Atlantic. They were treated like no better animals by their fellow black African slave traders than by the European slave traders. I'm terribly sorry if this does not fit your "view" of history, but it's the simple truth. Go read any book on the subject. Shit, go watch "Roots."
So. growing up hearing about "my people" oppressing "their people," it surprised me to look back on my childhood, and realize something entirely disturbing: I have been called a "honky," "cracker," "gringo"-and any other number of anti-white racial epithets-so many times as a child, that I STARTED TO ALMOST BELIEVE IT. My people must be evil... We must have something wrong with us to always treat people like this... It seemed to all be the White Man's fault... The exact defeatist attitude experienced by the blacks of the South from years and years of institutionalized racism had been experienced by me!
In contrast, I have probably heard the word "nigger" used in anger by a white person toward a black person less than a dozen times in my life, and certainly not more than once or twice as a child. But I can promise you there is not one black child in all of Los Angeles of the present generation, who got called "nigger" by whites more times than I've been called "honky" "whiteboy" or "cracker" by blacks. As I grew older, I retaliated against being ridiculed for being white, and many learned never to insult me again. I've always had black friends who have seen the exact thing I am talking about as true. I will probably offend many people just by using the "N" word, but that just makes me laugh. If you can't listen to the sound of a mere word uttered in critical symposium, how could your fight for freedom be anything but baseless and worthless?
I was one of the very very few white kids in my junior high school and high school, and I had to learn to fight. Period. You know why? Because black and Latino gangsters would beat the shit out of me for no reason other than going to school in their neighborhoods. Do I resent them for this? Not at all. In fact, it taught me many imperative facts of life, the most important of which is to defend myself...

Here's the reality of the situation: It is not the blacks who are responsible for this politically correct attitude. They are simply fooled by the same propaganda whites are... In order to destroy the American middle class, the New World Order has decided multiple race wars are necessary. They've already started the race war between Islam and "the West." In the Middle East, they have multiple race wars (Arabs vs. Jews, Sunni vs. Shiite, Kurd vs. Arab, Arab vs. Arab, Iraq vs. Iran, etc. etc. etc.) and inside the US, they have multiple cold race wars (white vs. black, white vs. Latino, black vs. Latino, etc. etc. etc.).
Race is the easiest dividing line in the world to exploit. People are naturally drawn toward things of like substance to themselves and their aesthetics. Prejudice exists in every human during every moment of their entire lives. You are prejudiced against certain foods, stores, geographies, and of course, people. Why should we attempt to be something we're not? Why would we deny the inherent prejudice in each of us? Is it wrong to prefer one type of human over another, the way you prefer to, let's say, visit one country over another? Why in the HELL are we so afraid to fucking OFFEND people?!?! I could personally give a rat's ass what color someone's skin is-I've met the good and bad of all races living in LA-but I could also care less what someone else's opinion is on the matter. If I offend weak-minded, confused people in the process, so be it...
So one might understand why someone like me would so greatly resent this politically correct atmosphere in which whites are "forbidden" to criticize blacks or other minorities, yet those same minorities are completely free to criticize whites. A sense of shame has been instilled in the urban white male, and an aura of weakness. I can't tell you how many minorities I've surprised by not being a victim. They are used to the white male's submission, so it can be a shock when a white male actually stands up for himself!
Which leads to my point: the only explanation for the marginalization of the white male's pride is political correctness. And the only explanation for political correctness is propaganda. I do believe that if it wasn't for our shit-hole media, blacks and whites would have long ago settled their differences and learned to live in harmony. "You might say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one..."

Right Versus Left: the Stepchild Paradigm

I can state without hesitation that the Left/Right Paradigm is the outstanding idiocy of the human race. There is no activity human beings involve themselves in which takes up so much of their time, without producing one positive thing, as Left/Right politics. All countries are victims of it, yet, like in many important areas, Americans simply take the cake for their supposed tradition, political intellect, and fervor from the Left and the Right.
First of all, there is no "Right" party in this country, and there hasn't been since the Whig Party. End of story. When the Whigs disappeared, the Democrats were simply MORE left than the present "Left" party: the REPUBLICANS! The Republican Party was the original Left party in this country, and their main positions have not changed... Once again: the Democrats were Left of the Left party, which already existed.
To be sure there are conservative-minded Americans, but they have not been truly represented by any major party since the 1820's.
The political Left in this country basically consists of those who feel a sense of guilt over their position of dominance over other countries, social classes, and races. They vote to force others to financially support the poor whom they feel responsible for, and they call it freedom. Perhaps "Leftism" is not the correct term; perhaps "self-guiltism" would be more appropriate...
This is the attitude which allows political correctness to exist. The soft-bellies on the Left are not the creators of political correctness, but simply those who most easily buy into it. When enough people bought into it, it was then possible to cram it down everyone else's throats. Some of us have resisted all along, but many were fooled and many were cowed.
I really don't want to leave the Right out, because Rightist thought is just as responsible for our present social state as Leftist thought, but political correctness is not usually equated with conservative thought. So they're exempt from blame on this issue... but a rather large number of conservative people have been cowed by political correctness...

Rightist thought is responsible, however, for the psychological preparation required for the constantly rising invasion of our privacies we all are experiencing... Enforcing morality is an old tactic of the supposed Right. This of course is the attitude which led to the drug war, and the social revolution of the 1960's. Any moron knows that the more you restrict something, the more attractive it becomes. Restrict sex, and kids will want to have sex... Restrict drugs, and kids will want to have drugs... It seems so simple to me. But it also seems obvious that the powers-that-be would recognize this, and thus it becomes another tier in the war against the American middle class. What better way to destroy the main component of any middle class-a strong sense of family-than to introduce drugs and sexual freedom to the youth? Of course, drug and sexual freedom should exist, but not as the opponent of anything, such as conservative morality. Sexual freedom and conservative morality can work hand in hand, just as it works with liberal morality. There is no need for conflict between the two, yet the Republicans have certainly promoted this conflict...
The main purpose of this Left/Right paradigm is to present an illusory choice, where there is no choice at all. The other side of the mirror may be the opposite of you, but it's still you. And the same may be said of Left/Right politics. They are opposite sides of the same reflection, nothing more...

The Self-Policed State Going the Way of the Dodo

I have noticed a sharp decline in politically correct self-policing in Los Angeles in the last few years. In much the same way a shepherd uses some of the sheep themselves to guide the other sheep, we have mostly been led towards political correctness not by those in power, but by the brainwashed sheep themselves. They bark and bark until you get back in line.
But ten years ago the politically correct fervor was at its highest pitch. It seems to have declined much in the last ten years, much to the chagrin of the New World Order, to be sure... Los Angeles is still a haven of politically correct scum, but more and more people I meet are sick of it.
If I hear one more person spout off about man-made global warming, sourcing Al Gore's propaganda film, I'm really going to try and vomit all over that person. If I hear one more person proudly tell me about their hybrid, or their bio-diesel car, I may just go 5150...
I've offended people with my research into the supposed Jewish "holocaust" even though I'm 1/4 Jewish, and over half of my close friends are Jewish. If one is looked down upon for researching the history of his own people, I pity the future...

copyright Brandon Dean, 2008

Must Watch---Thomas Paine and the Second American Revolution

Rip

I love the 80's New York band Big Black. They were a semi-industrial, semi-punk, completely original band which basically rejected all convention. They played with a drum machine, but it was somehow more raw than most bands with real drums. At live shows, they would throw lit fire-crackers into the audience, or shoot a water hose at them. They were little geeky-looking guys who looked like they had to get their asses kicked all the time for this behavior. I'm not from New York, so I can only assume some people loved them, and some people attacked them back. That's what would have happened in Los Angeles at any rate...
Their lyrics were sometimes outright dangerous ("the only good policeman is a dead one--the only good laws aren't enforced..." from Steelworker), but they were always brilliant. My favorite Big Black lyrics are in the song Rip:


That man's shirt is worth more than your life

And I'd rather kill him than insult you

He hasn't the sense to know we're fighting

He hasn't the fear to run

We have to rip this up

It doesn't look quite right

People like that, too dirty to save

Better watch out, friend

He's gonna get torn

When I poke my fingers in it

I tear him apart

Cover your ears

They make a lot of noise

We have to rip this up

It doesn't look quite right

What the Hell is Really Happening With the Russian/Georgian War?

The US, Israel, and Russia Interfere in Local Conflict...Genocide in Progress...World War III One Step Closer?
Brandon Dean
Thus Always to Tyrants
August 10, 2008

During the 1950's, French colonialism in Indochina was sliding down a slippery slope. The French had done the Vietnamese a lot of good amongst their colonial oppression, including import of first world merchandise, and turning Vietnam into a major world rubber producer. But the Vietnamese had had enough of them, and formed a coalition, eventually funded from outside by China and Russia, but at first a true movement of the people. Ho Chi Min was a revolutionary who'd been to the united States, and studied here. He wrote seven letters to the US government in the 1940's trying to establish diplomatic ties. After having visited here, admiring our society greatly and reading our Constitution and Declaration of Independence, he couldn't believe the united States ignored his letters, and would not be interested in a free movement of the people to rid itself of a foreign, colonial power! The communists were very open to recognizing the Vietnamese nation as free and independent from the French. Thus, through funding and military support, the Vietnamese movement turned from a revolution similar to ours to a communist takeover, just like in Cuba...
According to Senator JW Fulbright, who was the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during the 1940's and 50's, "We had testimony that his [Ho Chi Min's] one worry was that it was so insignificant-Vietnam was so far away and insignificant, that we would never bother about it... It's too small to ever attract the attention of the united States. He was sure in his mind that if we ever put our minds to it, and focused upon it, we would be for him. How different history would have been, for us, and for them, if we had felt a common interest in a colonial province like Vietnam seeking its independence from France..."

And so it goes with countless other seemingly insignificant regions of the world. Few in the US had even heard of Vietnam before 1960, and few have known about Georgia until now. Georgia is one of the Russian provinces which gained its independence from the USSR in the early 1990's, and has been a virtual cesspool of government corruption ever since. But hey, show me one government in the world which is not corrupt! Can't do it...
People's movements almost inevitably begin with genuine need, but they also almost inevitably end up being co-opted by the powers-that-be with the intention of guiding a supposed revolution in the manner that will best serve their nefarious purposes. Some corruption at high levels is nothing but personal assignation; looting the coffers for personal gain... But other corruption is of an organized breed, yet appears, on the surface, to be exactly the same as the former breed. In the end, this method is aimed toward personal gain also, but the difference is the CONSPIRACY, or collusion, with others to attain nefarious goals.
A thief walks into a store to steal for himself. A banker doesn't need a gun-in fact, he has YOU walking into HIS office of thievery to GIVE him your money!! His power lies in the conspiracy of bankers to obtain a tyranny over the common people. He uses his power as a banker to further the goals of the bankers in general, thus conspiring, and thus involved in a conspiracy...

The US training of Georgian troops and Georgia's involvement in the Iraq War

For years the US military has maintained a supposedly neutral presence in Georgia, like it does in about 130 other sovereign nations around the world. But like terrorist "sleeper cells" the contractors and military "advisers" lurk in the government shadows, making "suggestions" with implied threats, or promises of financial and military aid.
In 2002, the US, under the Georgia Train and Equip Program, started sending aid to Georgia in the form of body armor and surplus fatigues, and weapons (source). Georgia has repaid this debt by sending thousands of Georgian troops to Iraq as part of the supposed "multi-national" coalition led by the US against the Arab people. In fact, now they have the third highest number of troops in Iraq, after the US and Britain... Put THAT in your pipe and smoke it! There are 130 military advisers and contractors in Georgia right now, and US diplomats have already made it clear they have no intention of pulling them out any time soon...

The people of South Ossetia, caught in a giant trap

On one side you have the Russians, and supposedly the South Ossetians. On the other side you have the Georgian government, the US government, and who else but the Israeli government? The present conflict started when the Soviet Union "fell apart." Ossetia was split into two regions: North Ossetia and South Ossetia. North Ossetia was to be part of Russia; and South Ossetia was to be part of Georgia. Well, the South Ossetians are not too happy about this arrangement, and they've demanded either independence, or unification with North Ossetia, thus making South Ossetia part of Russia.
The Russians, and especially the North Ossetians, look at the South Ossetians as their fellow countrymen and brothers. And now, since the Georgian government (being freshly funded by the US) has decided to flex their military muscles, the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali is surrounded and besieged by Georgian troops, and those troops are being bombed by the Russians, who may also be bombarding other parts of Georgia. There is armed conflict in the streets of South Ossetia. According to different reports, anywhere from 1200 to 2000 Ossetian civilians have been killed in two days, by Russians and Georgians alike.

The Justifications

Georgia has announced several times its intentions to squash unrest in South Ossetia and other provinces with armed might. They claim the Russians are funding the South Ossetian revolutionary groups in order to bring the territory back under Russian, and therefore, Bolshevik control.
The Russians have a much better and more obvious justification: they are supposed to be protecting their fellow countrymen. How can you argue with that? They must know they are trying to protect themselves from US and Israeli involvement also, no?
Well here's the scoop, Jack... Both "justifications" are nothing but excuses for exercising lethal force on civilian populations to extol the riches of another defenseless people. Once again, those in power show their inability to include humanity in their business dealings... Georgia is of course rich in oil, and Russia has recently nationalized its oil fields. South Ossetia would be a nice boost to their already booming economy. And to cut off that supply would be a great asset to western oil interests...

The New World Order strikes again

The easiest way to understand what is happening right now, with the US on one side, and the Russians on the other, is to look at the New World Order involvement in every conflict which has ever existed between the two nations. During the "cold war," on the US side, you had the Zionist media, and the FBI hunting down communists instead of taking down the mafia. In Russia, you had the Zionist Bolsheviks slaughtering millions of Russians and blaming it on the US capitalists. And their media propaganda was no more or less invasive than ours...
During the Vietnam War, you had the Russians supplying the Viet Cong through their surrogates the Chinese Maoists. They were doing this to feed their war machine in the exact same way the war machine in the US was the driving force behind the US being there.
In Afghanistan, in the late 1970's and early 80's, the Russians invaded to feed their war machine while the US funded and trained the Mujahideen "freedom fighters" to fight them.
During the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980's, the Russians were funding the Iranians while the US was funding the Iraqis. Are we to understand that this cycle has somehow ended here?
Why is the US supporting the Georgians in a local conflict? Why the hell is Israel supporting the Georgians in a local conflict? Why does the Russian Premier, Putin, want to bomb South Ossetia to "save" it? What in God's name is going on here?

The spark which starts a firestorm

The US and Russian people had better take a serious look at this problem. Both nations are in possession of horrendously large amounts of nuclear weapons, capable of basically wiping each country off the face of the Earth, not to mention the fallout the rest will experience. Not only that, but each nation has the two strongest military forces in the world. So if it came to war, a conventional contest will likely be a stalemate, thus making nuclear conflict the only way to end the war. And that will not be good for anyone, even the idiots who run the New World Order, unless of course they've learned how to absorb poisonous radiation without dying...

I watched them pull a South Ossetian, Georgian HUMAN child out of the rubble left by a Russian bomb this morning, and if there's one thing I never want to see again, it's that. Something tells me it's inevitable though...

copyright Brandon Dean 2008

"Big Brother" by Stevie Wonder - - - Edited by CorbettReport.com

This is an amazing video put together by James Corbett of CorbettReport.com, set to the music of "Big Brother" by Stevie Wonder, from the album Talking Book. I'm a huge Stevie Wonder fan, and I've always loved this song. Thanks to Mr. Corbett for the fine video...

Reno Gonzalez Speaks From Jail-Part 2 of a 3 Part Interview

Reno explains what happened with him and the Browns
from the blog of Cirino Gonzalez (myspace registration required)
August 2nd, 2008



This is a great interview from jail by Reno Gonzalez. Following is a transcript of the interview:

Q: Ok, so they're actually considering 2 new charges against you. after they dropped the other two charges?

A: Yes, They think they can make it,use it a point to-because I was like as an example; I was waiting for the PSI meetings to happen. Then, so I could do it ,you know, face to face and I can get my side of the story out, because I hate this; what's really going on. You know, I dont want to chance it on this phone type stuff. You know I wanna sit down, look at…these are the facts, these are the facts. These are people that can tell you and, and tell you that nothing [happened]...and I was working on my own peace efforts. My own, you know my own missions. Uh well after the fact… you know. [I] had nothing to do with what this stuff they are trying to charge me with, or they have charged me with. Then uh after those meetings were done, like I said those were the PSI meetings, I was gonna ask for a bail hearing and my attorney is saying that he doesn't want me to ask for a bail hearing because he feels, and probably rightly so, that if I ask for my bail hearing since they dropped [the charges] against me they don't have any excuse anymore to say how dangerous, which they never had one in the first place because even though they had the gun charges against me they never said how I was threatening anybody with them, I was never,uh, you know, they were saying basically my military training was why I was a danger to society…even though they never showed one incident ever. By the way, this is my first arrest. They never even showed at any point, that I was a danger to anybody, I never even tried harming anybody. And contrary to the fact that all the peace efforts I've had in the past since 2006, uh,you know, they just totally dismiss it saying "Oh it doesn't matter" you know "we know you're trained" you know (inaudible) that's all there is to it. And that was their reason for holding me without bail (Ridley overtalking) progressed to basically what people's views [are] of our country and what their personal views are. Are we on the right track...they like to say on the news & stuff like that uhm with our foreign policies, with our personal economics, you know with our [personal] responsibilities to ourselves and other people....

Ridley: I'm sorry, I had,had a recorder stop me for a second, but I guess you answered my question there what the main thing people can do is to be vocal, is right where they are, is that correct?
A: Right. Yes, yes (laughs) (inadiable)

Q: Well, now do you still consider yourself an Ed Brown supporter, I know some of us kinda wondered when we heard the threats he was making had to kind of change our positions on him and you were actually thrown out of his house, do you still consider yourself an Ed Brown supporter?

A: Um, it's like a variety of people that came to talk to me there. Um, alot of them got turned away for one reason or another because of Ed's, you know, personal views, or spiritual views, or … during the…Usually what happened was when they [spoke with Ed] there was a falling-out for one reason or another. I'd talk to them and I'd be like this is, "I understand. This is an upsetting situation but, uh, your cause is still, I don't want to say righteous, but your cause is still just. Don't take it a personal, you know, attack on you and say 'Oh' & excuse yourself from the situation.
You know, I dont want to have anything to do with you anymore and just drop the whole cause. Uh alot of people are like, yeah, I understand uh, that he doesnt speak for everyone, he doesnt speak for you know, for everyone's views and they sorta took that in and went on forward with it like I did. I still believe that ,you know [the] Federal income tax is a huge form of uh, enslavement and … being able to go forward with that and talk about it and it kind of… every once in awhile people have to go back to [look at] Ed and Elaine and say look this is what happened to them, this is what they're standing for and (Operator; You have one minute left) and I'm not going to go back into like the whole, Oh he did this me and I heard he did that to that [those] people and, I take that out you know

Q: Reno, I'm sorry to interrupt you but it looks like we just got one minute left. Is there anything you'd like to add that I haven't asked you about?)
A: Uh, The thing that I'd like to get out the most is basically how uhm, There's a lot of people that are feeling that there is not enough support for a, a real movement, you know; if you will. Uh, a lot of people feel… when I talked to a lot of them about September 11th … when people…when talk to them about the tax issues & stuff like that. Uh, you know that they… obviously, the 9/11 truth movement and, of course, the tax truth movement, uhm… A lot of them feel like…"Ok. Yeah, we know this" you know. I've actually run into people that are like "Yeah. I know that. I know the government had a hand in what happened in September 11th" or "I know that the taxes are wrong." I've actually met multi-generational, you know, people. They're like "Oh yeah, my grandfather, my father, and myself are all against it." but no one really… there's no support behind it, there is no real, you know, talking and I'm like "No, there's protest all the time, you know, there are actually marches going on all the time, you know, throughout the year. You guys just don't hear about it because the media blocks it out." Uh, alot of people feel isolated, alot of people feel like they are powerless to really affect change and thats not really the case. It's mostly because alot of us are sort of isolationist, if you will. Uh, you know and we all just want to be left alone so we really don't go out and venture into finding groups because we are happy to be our own selves, to have our own families, and we just want to be left alone to live our lives happily.

Q: So what you're trying to say is the tax protest movement and the 9/11 truth movement are alot bigger than people realize?

A: Yes, they're actu…they are huge; just huge. And every year it just gets more and more obvious. An example is what the, uh, the truth from the uh, Aaron Russo's America Freedom to Fascism. They're actually passing that DV down, uh, DVD. You know , they're making copies of it in Iraq. And they're actually running around they're actually running around passing these deevs…I mean these DVDs to each other, you know trying to spread the truth amongst themselves… because it all ties in with the Federal Reserve and it all ties in to September 11th,it all ties in to the government being controlled by the banking institutions and the oil companies have it…they're all wrapped up into it. They, they're not stupid. They're running around. CID is actually running around trying to find these people who're making these copies and distributing them over there and I know they're doing it because first hand I had a guy run up in to the office one day and give it to me and pass it in his holster.
Ridley; I want anyone caught with one of those masks arrested.
Cirino: laughs
End of recording.

Thanks Kimberly for your efforts.

Update: I Don't Know Whether I'm Shot, Fucked, Powder Burnt or Snake-Bit...

Update: I Don't Know Whether I'm Shot, Fucked, Powder Burnt or Snake-Bit...
Brandon Dean
Thus Always to Tyrants
August 1st, the year of our Word, 2008

If you don't gather from the title how intense, stressful, and even exhilarating my life has been lately, then I'm not performing my job correctly...
I am, as we speak, in the middle of moving from one house to the next. It is a huge step upward, in the sense that I'll be saving 250 dollars in rent a month, I now live in a stand-alone house (no one walking and playing pool above me), my new neighborhood is much better than my old, and quite a few other things.
So that's taking up a little of my time... In fact, I should be doing things associated with moving as I type, but I feel a need to communicate with my worthy readers concerning a number of topics.

The first topic is the new site. In lieu of how busy I am this weekend, I will not be able to start the new site until sometime this next week. I'm basically working three different jobs right now, and I'm simply going to have to fit this between the other pieces of the puzzle...
The new site will be called www.wizardofoswald.com. This play on words is supposed to represent the relationship between the power of the media (The Wizard of Oz), and the power of the secret government (Lee Harvey Oswald). A quick explanation for those unfamiliar with how I feel on these topics, which of course will be included on the site: Lee Harvey Oswald was one of the great American heroes. History has maligned his memory horribly, and it's far past time to set the record straight. In contrast to the mainstream idea that he either killed the president (for official story believers), or almost did, or would have, or any number of other vague ideas the alternative press endorses, he was actually trying to stop the assassination!
In The Wizard of Oz, we have an elaborate allegory played out with cinematography. It is one of the penultimate examples of the story which, no matter what happens, in the end, none of it was real. In an esoteric sense, this is a positive message, but for the general public who viewed it and loved it, it was a soothing masterpiece of fairy tale. Don't worry--no matter what happens, everything will be ok in the end... Arbitrary happenstance will save you in the end. Magic slippers don't hurt either...
So that's the method of my madness behind the "Wizard of Oswald." I know, I'm out of my fucking gourd...

I am officially over my anger towards actionwars.com. They respectfully took down the flash logo I designed. For those who may be "checking up on me" (for example, the one who calls himself "Boss" hahaha), I wish you all sweet dreams and marmalade sunshiney days... :)

That being said, I've just started a new job in the last couple weeks, which is taking up alot of my time, but hey, that's what we humans do, right? The money helps with my roof and the insane gasoline prices.

I now believe more than ever in the power of humility before the power of the universe. For the first time in my entire life, I spoke with my voice to God. This happened a couple weeks ago, and the "coincidences" which followed this conversation with Nature were of course not coincidences at all. I have ironed out my course of action for fighting the new world order with God, and it is now my full mission in life. First, I must set my house in order (the metaphorical house, that is...), then I can go about my plan.
The first portion of my plan is to build wizardofoswald.com. That will cost no money, and it naturally would be the foundation of my greater plan.
The next part of the plan deals with content for the new site. The technologies which now exist for gathering video and transferring it to the internet are readily available. By tasking people with ripping the news from TV to the internet (a couple of whom already exist with the technology), we will be able to draw thousands of people to the new site through video sites like youtube.com and google video.
With advanced analysis of news events we will keep the traffic coming back. There are already a few people who are willing to contribute to real news articles, written by members to a standard worthy of the word "truth." There will of course be no censorship of ideas at Wizardofoswald.com. The very idea is repugnant to me. Strict anonymity will be maintained for those who wish it. We are soldiers in an information war conducted over the internet, and we should all be soldiers in real life fighting the new world order in every way conceivable. There is no time or excuse for procrastinating at this point. We all know what's going on enough to know it's coming to a head, and preparation is the only thing which will get you through the storm to come.

I wish everyone the best, and I hope you are not as pulled from both ends as I am right now.

And don't let the title fool you--I am never in a bad mood--everything is just fine. I love change, and I've certainly had alot in the last couple weeks! hahaha

I wish you and all of your families health and happiness on this August First, in the year of our Word, Two-Thousand Eight.

With all plights deserved...

copyright 2008 Brandon Dean

IN-Actionwars.com bans administrator and moderator for discussing holocaust

Actionwars.com Goes Traitor!! hot off the presses!! hahaha
Brandon Dean
Thus Always To Tyrants
July 23, 2008



(In-)Actionwars.com has fallen from its low pinnacle in the last two days. I'm sorry to say it, but I've been randomly banned from my own site, which I was the administrator for. I did all the work on the site, and apparently the other two admins, without discussing it with me at all, have gone ahead and banned my IP for DARING to openly discuss the fact that the supposed "holocaust" never happened. Not to mention for DARING not to walk on eggshells about it. sorry, I have big fucking boots, and I don't even feel the eggshells as I SMASH them!
I've been working on completely re-vamping that entire site for the last three months, and now I will simply take all that work and start my own site. hahahaha!
A fellow member, one FrancisDade, was banned along with me. We will be the first two members of a truly FREE interactive website, complete with news.

This is my ANNOUNCEMENT to a CANDID world: nothing will stop me. this is open war: free men versus the New World Order, and THERE ARE NO PRIZES FOR SECOND PLACE. it's kill or be killed. what do you do when you see a black widow spider? You fucking STOMP on it!!! DEAD!!!

I will never stop discussing the holocaust or any other issue of TRUTH.

Hey all you cunts out there!! You can't scare me and you can't stop me!! I will not stop until the new world order is stomped dead into the ground--ashes to ashes, shit to shit. goodbye!!

fuck inactionwars! They call it "actionwars" and the catchphrase for the site is: "the info is out there---now it's time to take action" HAHAHAHAHA rich!!

Not one "action" has been taken the entire time I've been at the site. I'm the only one who seems to spend countless hours trying to better the site and fill it with content, and they ban me because the little queasy bitches don't understand what the word "WAR" means.

The New World Order could care LESS about our little melodramas. they have the minds focused on their goals. we squabble over the scraps from their table

The Wizard of Oswald, Chapter II: The Slow War Against the American Middle Class

The Wizard of Oswald, Chapter II: The Slow War Against the American Middle Class
Brandon Dean
Thus Always to Tyrants
6-26-08



Lee Harvey Oswald was an American hero. Not because he killed Kennedy, but because he didn't kill Kennedy... In the three days between the day he was arrested for the murders of Dallas Police officer J.D. Tippit and President John F. Kennedy, and the day he was murdered on live television, Oswald repeatedly proclaimed his innocence at any opportunity. He actually said "I'm just a patsy..."
Now, that's not too amazing or impressive, since any person fighting for their life might say anything to shift blame somewhere else. However, Oswald had a whole life we've never been told about, which is slowly unfolding as the years go by. It turns out, Oswald was cheating on his wife with a young scientist, who worked for the CIA attempting to discover a way to kill Fidel Castro with a cancer virus. She was intimidated into silence until the 90's, when she finally went public.
Two or three days before the assassination of JFK, the last time she ever talked to Oswald, he told his girlfriend that he couldn't get out of the assassination plot-even if he ran, they'd find him and kill him. But, if he stayed, and went through with the plan, there would be one less person firing at Kennedy... Oswald was actually trying to stop the assassination. He also stated there were a couple other agents on his side, who were also trying to stop it. Once he discovered that he wasn't able to stop it, Oswald decided to stick around and not fire at him. It seems he wasn't even in position to fire at Kennedy, though... He was obviously set up.

Oswald was a victim of the war against the middle class in America. He was a young, impressionable man, and he greatly aspired to be a secret agent. He was an ultra-nationalist, a true believer in the American Dream. He trusted those above him to guide his secret life for the betterment of the united States. He was betrayed...

...And so were the rest of us. The Ninjas of the Far East believed "The best poison is the slowest poison." Why? Because the slower the poison, the less likely it is the perpetrator will be caught. A slow poison leaves no trace...
And so it is with a Slow War. The slower the war, the less likely it is anyone can discover the true cause. Such is the case with the Slow War against the American middle class. It began soon after the War for Independence, which ended in 1781. European banksters sent representatives to the united States immediately to lobby legislators to institute a private central bank, which was to be under the control of the European banksters. They got their first bank, with famous politician Alexander Hamilton leading the charge. The public hated the bank, and the congress killed it in 1811. A year later, the British invaded the united States and sacked Washington DC, destroying thousands of original founding documents. Two years later, in 1814, they got their second bank.
In 1828, an unexpected defeat left Andrew Jackson President of the united States. Jackson was greatly and vocally anti-private central bank. His platform to get elected leaned heavily on States' Rights. Once in office, he made it his mission in life to destroy the central Bank of the United States. He succeeded in 1833--the first year of his second term--when congress denied the bank a new charter.
The European banksters simply changed their plans, and decided the easiest way to destroy the American middle class, and hopefully America itself, would be to split the country through civil war. They succeeded in starting a war between the North and South in 1860.
The South was hopelessly caught in a web of political lies and monetary misfortunes; they simply wanted to save their honor, which was kind of hard while the federal government was slamming heavy trade restrictions on Southern exports, destroying their economy. The South had simply had enough. And conversely, Abraham Lincoln--who is certainly deserving of alot of the criticisms he receives in the alternative press--was simply trying to save the Union. He actually publicly stated he could care less about slavery as compared to saving the Union. So the banksters had him killed by a man who actually claimed to represent European banksters...



Since the Civil War didn't destroy the country, the banksters' next plan was to simply enslave the American public through voluntary contract. They introduced a slow poison, which at first only affected newly-"freed" slaves, but gradually engulfed us all. Their slow poison was called the 14th Amendment. It supposedly freed slaves, but in reality, the supposedly freed slaves were forced to apply for licenses and permits to do the things free Americans could do, such as owning a gun, or marrying a white woman (and eventually even a black woman), buying land, running a business, and so forth... So the slaves' ownership was transferred from plantation owners to the government, and therefore those who control the government. All they had to do was sign on the dotted line to transfer their new-found freedom into government hands...

Their next step was the Act of 1871, referred to by "history" as the Ku Klux Klan Act. It was supposed to shut down the operations of organizations like the Klan, but the problem was, the way they planned to do this was by creating a corporation called the United States, and laying out a different letter of law for all federal territories. This created the District of Columbia, and assigned to it a corporate system of law. Coincidentally, the KKK grew to its greatest number and power forty years after this "KKK Act" supposedly "did away" with these miscreants. Interesting, no?


KKK march on Washington DC in 1925, over 50 years after the "KKK Act." There were millions of KKK members who had joined since 1871, swelling their numbers to the largest in history before the FBI finally shut down their power base starting in the 1930's.

The banksters' next success was two-fold: one was the Federal Reserve Act, and the other was the 16th Amendment. The Federal Reserve Act in 1914 finally brought back the private central bank for the first time since 1834, when Andrew Jackson destroyed it. The 16th Amendment introduced the income tax, which, as the Supreme Court has consistently ruled, inferred no new power of taxation to the government. It is simply a word game, enforced through scare tactics, and was never even legally ratified by Congress in the first place!
After that, the banksters decided to start fracturing the world through massive wars, involving many nations. The first was World War I, where many countries were dragged into a seemingly meaningless war, which was actually geared toward destroying the German nation's middle class nationalism. This backfired on them (or did it?), which resulted in World War II. The results of these two massive wars were manifold:

• a massive arms buildup throughout the "first" world.
• the creation of the State of Israel.
  
• the creation of first the League of Nations, and when that failed, the United Nations
• the paradigm of the Cold War
• miscellaneous results, such as enlightening the thinking man, who is now aware of the corruption in national and international government, and of government's collusion with big business.
• cleared the whole of Asia for American commerce, which before had been kept in check by the Japanese
• cleared the whole of Eastern Europe for Soviet terror
  

In the midst of these two wars, the banksters attacked the middle class in America further by inducing the Great Depression. They did this by first collapsing the speculative markets, then by stopping the flow of cash into the country. The actual amount of cash on the streets, so to speak, before 1929 until 1933, fell by thousands of percent. The banksters take cash off the streets by raising interest rates for loans until no one can afford the interest rates, so less and less people are able to take out loans. And when people can't take out loans to cover their previous loans, they end up foreclosing on their present loans. Where does their real property go? That's right--directly into the coffers of the banksters... See where I'm going with this? The banksters, who had the ability to cause a depression through collectively raising interest rates and collapsing the stock markets, had every motive to do it.
In the midst of the Great Depression, President Franklin Roosevelt stabbed the heart of the American people, and stuck the blade as far as he could stick it. He passed a law which forced the American people to sell the government their real asset called gold, for a paper asset called a Federal Reserve Note. Anyone who did not comply faced a 10,000 dollar fine (sorta like a 100,000 dollar fine in today's dollar), and ten years in prison. In a big media parade, he locked up the American people's gold in the newly built Fort Knox. There it supposedly remains, but anyone paying attention knows it's all been used as collateral on the "national debt," which of course came into existence due to the debt-based fractional reserve policies of the Federal Reserve.
And ever since these events, culminating in World War II, the onslaught has been perpetual. We haven't had a rest. There are so many examples of their attacks, that only a partial list will suffice in convincing you of my theory of this Slow War on the middle class. So here is a list of all the fronts in the banksters' war against he American middle class, and this list is incomplete:

• Supposedly mandated vaccinations. When this program began, there was one "mandatory" vaccine. Now, a child is bullied into dozens of vaccines by the time they're sixteen years old.
• The gradual dumbing down of American youth through state-funded education. Compare school tests from the 1950's to those of now. Kids graduate high school today sometimes without being able to read or write.
• Designer Diseases such as ADHD, ADD, Collitis, Leaky Gut Syndrome, etc... These "diseases," which didn't exist fifty years ago, are designed to draw a profit for pharmaceutical companies, and to gradually grind away at the health of Americans.
• Designed Diseases: AIDS was created to target minorities, drug users, gays, and hemophiliacs, has killed millions of people, and is still killing hundreds of thousands of people in Africa a year..
  
• Gun laws: In order to destroy the powerful middle class in this country, our guns must be confiscated. They are achieving this in bits and pieces, through nit-picking legislation at state and federal levels.
• Television. As discussed in The Wizard of Oswald, Chapter I, television psychologically and physically numbs the brain's ability to creatively think for themselves, and promotes the ideas and desires of those who broadcast television, which is tightly restricted and regulated by the government.
• False Flag Terror: Terrorist attacks on our country have been on the rise since the 1960's, when John F. Kennedy was killed by the banksters, who blamed it on Lee Harvey Oswald, who was actually attempting to stop the assassination. These attacks are always aimed at achieving a clandestine goal by banksters.
• Destruction of the Family: this is the most important front in their war. With the unity of the regenerating nuclear family, the destruction of the middle class is impossible. This front incorporates all other fronts, as all other fronts affect the family. In fact, this war could appropriately be referred to as the Slow War on the American Middle Class and the American Family.
  

It's unbelievable. This list is too short, but I don't feel like spending the next week listing everything I can think of, and you probably don't have time to read it all, so for the sake of brevity, I'll end it there.
The Slow War has certainly been ramping up in the last ten years. It took the banksters 75 years to get their central bank back after Jackson took it from them. It took our present government a few weeks to destroy the Bill of Rights after September 11th, 2001. It took the Federal Reserve 57 years to finally get rid of the Gold Standard. It took three years to destroy America's reputation through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It took ten years of depression to make the Americans fall for World War II. It took Bush stuttering on national television for a couple minutes the night of September 11th, 2001, to get the American people to fall for the present war. See where I'm going?
The intelligence, common sense, currency, health, pride, stature, property, and very identity of the American people are all going down the toilet. It was slow at first, but now the floodgates are open, and the tide is in.



Yet all tides ebb and flow. All diseases come and go, and the banksters are a disease-neither designer nor designed-of the human race. And the human race, if it wishes to survive, must purge this disease using our immune system's white blood cells, better known as the TRUTH.

Watch this ten minute video on the US Corporation to get a better understanding of what's really going on around here:



End, Chapter II

Copyright Brandon Dean 2008

congress could drive gas to $2 a gallon if they got off their asses

Gas could fall to $2 if Congress acts, analysts say
Limiting speculation would push prices to fundamental level, lawmakers told

By Rex Nutting & Michael Kitchen,
MarketWatch

Last update: 4:24 p.m. EDT
June 23, 2008

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The price of retail gasoline could fall by half, to around $2 a gallon, within 30 days of passage of a law to limit speculation in energy-futures markets, four energy analysts told Congress on Monday.

Testifying to the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Michael Masters of Masters Capital Management said that the price of oil would quickly drop closer to its marginal cost of around $65 to $75 a barrel, about half the current $135.

Fadel Gheit of Oppenheimer & Co., Edward Krapels of Energy Security Analysis and Roger Diwan of PFC Energy Consultants agreed with Masters' assessment at a hearing on proposed legislation to limit speculation in futures markets.

Krapels said that it wouldn't even take 30 days to drive prices lower, as fund managers quickly liquidated their positions in futures markets.

"Record oil prices are inflated by speculation and not justified by market fundamentals," according to Gheit. "Based on supply and demand fundamentals, crude-oil prices should not be above $60 per barrel."

Futures trading in London has not been a major factor in rising oil prices, testified Sir Bob Reid, chairman of the Chairman of London-based ICE Futures Europe. Rising prices are largely a function of fundamental supply and demand, not manipulation or speculation, he said.

"Energy speculation has become a growth industry and it is time for the government to intervene," said Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., chairman of the full committee. "We need to consider a full range of options to counter this rapacious speculation." It was Dingell's strongest statement yet on the role of speculators.

Dingell introduced a bill on June 11 that would ask the Energy Department to gather the facts on energy prices, including the role played by speculators. See full story.

There are two kinds of speculators in the futures markets, Masters said. Traditional speculators are those who need to hedge because they actually take physical possession of the commodities. Index speculators, on the other hand, are merely allocating a portion of their portfolio to commodity futures.

Index speculation damages price-discovery mechanisms provided by futures markets, Masters added

The committee will likely consider legislation that would rein in index speculation by imposing higher-margin requirements; setting position limits for speculators; requiring more disclosure of positions; and preventing pension funds and investment banks from owning commodities.

Both major presidential candidates have supported closing loopholes that encourage speculation in the energy markets. Read more on Election Blog.

However, other witnesses said that pure speculators have had little impact on energy prices, which have doubled in the past year to about $135 per barrel. Both Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman have dismissed the impact of speculators on prices paid by consumers.

Speculators now account for about 70% of all benchmark crude trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange, up from 37% in 2000, said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the investigations subcommittee. Stupak introduced a bill on Friday that would limit index speculation.

There has been much discussion recently about how big a role speculators have been playing in the sharp rise in energy prices, though no consensus has emerged on this point.

Congress, however, has grown increasingly concerned over speculative investors' role in the energy market in comparison with those buying futures contracts to hedge against risk from price changes. Lawmakers are expected to consider legislation to set strict limits -- or in some cases, an outright ban -- on speculative trading in energy futures in some markets.

Dingell is looking into any legal loopholes that may have contributed to speculation in energy markets. In 1991, according to documents provided by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to the committee's investigators, the agency authorized the first exemption from position limits for swap dealers with no physical commodity exposure. This began what Dingell said was "a process that has enabled investment banks to accumulate enormous positions in commodity markets."

Is Congress barking up the wrong tree?

Neal Ryan, manager at Ryan Oil & Gas Partners, said that if Congress develops regulations to cut back speculative trading, speculation will just find a new home.

"Speculation is the root of capitalism," he said. "If the speculation is forced out of the U.S. exchanges, it'll simply show up on other exchanges that are OTC like the ICE, or new exchanges will pop up to allow for the spec trades to continue functioning."

Ryan said he does see a reason for Congress to look at eliminating aspects such as allowing West Texas intermediate crude oil futures to trade on foreign markets and the "Enron loophole," but "these exchanges are currently functioning as they are supposed to in a free marketplace."

The creation of a comprehensive U.S. energy policy that tackles issues of increasing domestic supply and reining in consumer demand via conservation should be Congress' focus, Ryan said. "Instead we're on bended knee begging the Saudis to put more oil on the market and talking about shutting down spec trades."

Rex Nutting is Washington bureau chief of MarketWatch.
Michael Kitchen is a copy editor for MarketWatch and is based in New York. Nate Becker contributed to this report from San Francisco.

source

*

Brandon Dean says:

get up right now and call your congresscritters!! senators! Everyone! email them! shut down their phone lines and internet lines! I'm going to post a form letter in the comments section of this post, so if you don't have a chance to write your own, you can copy and paste in your email...
this has got to become mainstream news!

Lindsay Williams -- The Energy Non-Crisis

Lindsay Williams -- The Energy Non-Crisis
Granada Forum
YouTube.com

The Energy Non-Crisis, Part 6






Part 7




Part 8

Second trial unlikely for Browns ally

Second trial unlikely for Browns ally
By Margot Sanger-Katz
Monitor staff
June 17, 2008 - 9:57 am

Prosecutors in the case of a man accused of bringing weapons to the Plainfield home of tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown have moved to dismiss the outstanding counts against him, effectively asking the judge to cancel his trial, scheduled for next week.

Cirino Gonzalez of Alice, Texas, was convicted in April of conspiring to prevent U.S. Marshals from arresting the Browns following their conviction for tax-related felonies. The Browns were able to hold off federal authorities for nearly nine months last year while they holed up with guns, bombs and supporters in their self-sufficient home, issuing threats.

The jury found Gonzalez guilty of aiding and abetting the couple and conspiring to prolong the standoff. But they were unable to reach verdicts on a second, similar conspiracy count and a charge that Gonzalez had used weapons as part of the conspiracy.

A second trial was scheduled to begin with jury selection later this week. But the motion, filed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Arnold Huftalen, asks the judge to dismiss the charges "without prejudice," meaning the government could bring the same charges again at a later date. According to the motion, Gonzalez's lawyer agrees the charges should be dismissed.

"The defendant and the government agree that it is in their respective best interests that the remaining two counts be dismissed, without prejudice, and that the defendant be sentenced on the two counts upon which he has been convicted," the motion reads.

Lawyers working on the case have said they will not comment until a verdict is reached.

During the long stay at their fortified concrete home, the Browns entertained a rotating cast of supporters, who brought them food, weapons and communication with the outside world. Many of those supporters, Gonzalez among them, shared their view that there was no legal basis for the federal income tax. During the prolonged standoff, they hosted concerts, participated in a daily internet radio show and made frequent public threats to harm law enforcement figures should they try to arrest the couple. They were apprehended in October by a team of undercover marshals posing as supporters. According to the marshals, the arrest was made without incident.

After their arrest, agents searched the house and found dozens of improvised explosive devices on the property, more than 20 rifles and tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition. A videotaped tour of the house played in court showed weapons and ammunition positioned near windows. Bombs and bomb-making materials were stored beside matches and fuses. Jars of explosive material were nailed to trees with orange targets facing toward windows.

Gonzalez, a former military contractor and naval weapons expert, lived with the Browns for several months last year and described himself at the time as their security expert. He ran errands on their behalf and wrote frequent updates about their story on various blogs and MySpace pages. Evidence offered during his first trial showed that he bought a .50-caliber sniper rifle while living in New Hampshire and brought two other guns with him from Texas. A .50-caliber rifle can shoot at long distances with very high accuracy.

In a video, shown three times to the jury, Gonzalez explained that government agents should be concerned about the military training held by many Browns supporters.

"We have weapons, and we're going to defend ourselves. We know what's going on," he says on the video, shot from the Browns' fourth-floor observation deck, described by one federal prosecutor as a "turret." "This is a serious situation. This is basically a revolution."

According to statements made by relatives and Gonzalez's testimony during the trial, he left the house last June after arguing with Ed Brown about security measures at the house. Much of his defense centered on showing that there were no bombs or bomb-making materials when he was living at the house.

Gonzalez also testified that he had not visited the Browns to help them. He told jurors that he had driven from Texas to New Hampshire in order to capitalize on the attention the Browns were receiving. He said he hoped he would be able to meet other anti-government activists in Plainfield and find a wider platform for his own political causes, which included ending the war in Iraq and stopping the use of depleted uranium in government weapons.

"Their cause wasn't exactly my cause," he testified.

Gonzalez was tried with two other Brown supporters. Both were found guilty of aiding and arming the tax-protesting couple. Jason Gerhard of Brookhaven, N.Y., and Daniel Riley of Cohoes, N.Y., were convicted of conspiracy, aiding and abetting, and bringing firearms to the couple. Riley was also convicted of handling destructive devices as part of the conspiracy; Gerhard faced a similar charge but was found not guilty. A fourth co-conspirator, Robert Wolffe of Randolph, Vt., pleaded guilty to conspiracy and accessory charges and testified during the trial. The men are scheduled for sentencing in August.

Last week, it appeared Gonzalez would plead guilty to at least one of the charges. A hearing was scheduled on his court docket for a change of plea, and Gonzalez's girlfriend, Donna Van Meter, said Gonzalez had agreed to plead guilty to the conspiracy charge if prosecutors dismissed the weapons charge, which carries a five-year mandatory minimum sentence. Gonzalez did not plead guilty at the hearing.

According to a MySpace post made by Gonzalez's father, Jose Gonzalez, his son changed his mind because the written plea agreement differed from the verbal agreement he had discussed with prosecutors before the hearing.

The Browns are serving 63-month prison sentences for their original tax crimes but have not been charged in connection with the standoff. U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier, who led the investigation, has suggested the Browns will face charges sometime in the future.

There is no indication Gonzalez has agreed to cooperate in any future prosecution. Although he appears to have little love for the Browns - in court, he said that Ed Brown was a "jerk" - Van Meter said he would not promise to testify as part of his aborted plea agreement.

The Wizard of Oswald, Chapter I, by Brandon Dean

The Wizard of Oswald-Chapter I
Television: The Lazy, Soft-Brainwashing Machine
Brandon Dean
Thus Always to Tyrants
6/07/08

The human brain is too complex for us to understand all its functions, and what patterns it operates in. We have no true notion of the full effects of external stimulation. For instance, the effects of such things as television, advertising, and "news" media are largely unknown to us at this time. It's interesting to note that our government is heavily involved in all three of these subjects. To put it simply, we have no true idea what these three things have done to our collective and individual psyches since their inceptions within the last century. Advertising and news media certainly existed before the last century, but both have experienced monumental makeovers since the inception of the third: television.
Before television, information not only traveled much slower, but information was also extremely open to critical skepticism. When you listen to something on the radio, or you read something in a newspaper, your brain naturally creates images to go along with whatever subject you are listening to or reading. In other words, the brain is stimulated into action, which is a good thing, like exercise. But television creates the images for you, therefore not stimulating your brain, but rather numbing it, making it lazy so to speak...
Television, or rather those who create television, exploit this side effect of television to the fullest. Where did they learn the tactics? Well, the answer is very easy. The culprit's name is... Edward Bernays.

Edward Bernays: the Father of Spin

Edward Bernays was the nephew of Sigmund Freud. He was a psychologist in his youth, following in his uncle's footsteps. But then he found his niche. The niche was his personal invention: the PR industry. Bernays wrote a book called Propaganda. Propaganda was extremely popular amongst the elite of the world, especially amongst psychologists, businessmen, and those cretins involved in eugenics societies. Bernays himself belonged to a eugenics society. Among Bernays' followers were Colonel Edward Mandell House (President Wilson's shadow---I mean, adviser), Josef Goebbels (Hitler's Propaganda Minister), and many more despicable Illuminati devils... Bernays was responsible for such propaganda masterpieces as: the Suffragettes of New York City marching in the Macy's Christmas Day Parade in the 30's, at a time when no "lady" smoked cigarettes or anything else in public, and orange juice for breakfast. He basically just started advertising orange juice as perfect for breakfast, paid a bunch of doctors to corroborate the story, and put their testimonies in the ads. Suffice it to say, after years of a constant barrage of these ads, the collective American brain just accepted it as a truth.
Hitler once said "The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it." You know where he learned that from? Goebbels. You know who Goebbels learned it from? Yup--Edward Bernays and his book Propaganda...
And this is the basic premise behind the PR industry: lie your ass off, repeatedly, over and over and over and over again, and if you have enough money to keep paying for the ads, eventually the collective brain will accept it as truth.
Applied to what I wrote above about television creating the image for you, you should begin to understand the jump that was made in the profitability of advertising with the invention of television. Before television, the brain stood a much better chance of resisting propaganda. It still had to create the image, as opposed to having the image created for it.
And you can bet your ass that once the powers-that-be discovered the explosive manipulative power of television, which they discovered immediately, they jumped on and claimed all the best airwaves, and regulated the shit out of the rest. Then they funded research into both improving the quality of television and propagandizing the populace with television.

The brain is ruled by the subconscious, and powered by electric signals generated from the heart. The heart generates its electricity from the Earth, whose source of electric power is the sun, whose electric power comes from the center of the galaxy, and so on. Round and round it goes, and where it stops, nobody knows... Truth be told, it never stops.
Television wave molecules are so much less dense than our bodies that they travel right through our bodies. And they exist naturally. We just harness them on both the transmitting and receiving ends...
But, being that our brain is ruled mostly by the subconscious, what we see leaves an imprint in our brain. Never mind the fact that you are staring directly into light (as you are right now reading this)--the symbols which stick in your subconscious are what's really to worry about. As most people are aware, a flash of an image in the middle of non-related video can be retained by your brain without you being conscious of it at all. But flashing images aren't the only danger. Colors associated with sounds leave a deep imprint on our brain. It makes sense if you think about it: when you're out in nature, your brain associates colors with sounds and smells, such as the red of a rose, or the green of a pasture, or the sweet-sour smell in the air around a lemon tree... You don't have to think about it--your brain instinctively delineates these patterns for you. And television works the same way. Your brain categorizes imagery, and associates it with the words, sounds and emotions displayed in the sitcom, commercial, news show, et cetera...
The solution to this quandary is simple: first, turn off your television set. Second, toss it out the window. Third, take a twelve gauge scattergun and blow it to hell where it belongs...

end, part 1

copyright 2008 Brandon Dean

Go and stock up people, don´t wait

Go and stock up people, don´t wait
Brandon Dean
Actionwars.com
June 10 2008

People have been crying for years about this crisis, or that crisis, and all of their crises are the biggest, most life-threatening crises ever. Well, sit back and judge this crisis for yourself. We have a food crisis in this world. It's real, and it could potentially threaten YOU at any moment. The supply lines of food have been being choked for years down to narrow bottlenecks by huge corporate buyouts and purposeful maladjustment. It now appears to be coming to a head in many different parts of the world.
It's coming to a head at this moment in the form of truckers' strikes. An online friend of mine named "Kap25", who lives in Spain, has now revealed that, because of a local truckers' strike, her corner grocers ran out of food. Not only that, but by mid afternoon today, the petrol stations in her neighborhood ran out of gas.
Kap25 is prepared; she and her family have previously taken measures for just this eventuality... She has plenty of storable food packed away to last her family quite a while. But, as we all know, some people are wise, and some are not. My guess would be that most of the people who have so far been hit by this sudden life-threatening crisis never saw it coming at all... And now they are left to fend for themselves. This may be the world wide crisis we "paranoid types" have been forewarning of.

In other words, shit may just get remarkably crazy, remarkably fast... It may not of course, but three striking truckers have already been murdered in rioting so far--all within the last few weeks... One died in Spain, one in Australia, and one in Portugal. And my friend now cannot purchase food regularly.

Maybe it's time for us in the states to start preparing for the eventuality that this crisis, hitting dozens of countries already, may just come here to the US?
I personally have at least six months of food stored away, and I've been constantly building it over the last six months. Preparedness is the word of the moment. PREPAREDNESS, like a god damn boy scout, no joke.

Get ready... like Kap25 said in a recent response to a thread at actionwars.com's forums, Go and stock up people, don´t wait

brandon

Take Back the Right to Parent Your Children

Take Back the Right to Parent Your Children
Elswyth Thane

June 9, 2008
ActionWars.com

In the U.S. and around the world, we are seeing more and more cases likethe one in May 2008 in Texas where hundreds of children were forcibly taken from their families. The authorities in Texas had neither any real evidence nor any real testimony to justify that massive kidnapping of over 400 children. What was their basis for such action? It was an anonymous phone call alleging that children were being sexually abused by adult members of the Mormon sect.

Because of the large number of children taken and the amount of force used by the government in this case, it was widely publicized. However, the egregious injustice on the part of government agents and officials is all too common nowadays. I have read and listened to countless cases over the last decade or so in which children have been ripped from the arms of caring, loving and protective parents due to false and often anonymous accusations of child abuse. A child gets hurt playing outside or is bitten by a neighborhood dog. Suddenly, the parents find themselves being accused of abusing the child or of criminal neglect, and their child seized by a government agency. Then they are faced with a laborious and costly fight to get their child back. In many cases, this fight lasts for several months or even years.

In several areas of the country, like Pinellas County in Florida, the definition of the term "abuse" is extremely broad. It is so broad that literally any parent, no matter how nurturing, conscientious or morally upright, could easily find him/herself facing charges of child abuse and have his or her children seized. In the area of Florida I refer to, the parent is not even granted the right to face his or her accuser in court or the right to know the name of his/her accuser.

How can we take back our parental rights? The saying, "Knowledge is power" is quite true, so we need to get informed about the laws concerning the family in our counties and states. Then start spreading the word in your area about laws that are overly intrusive and which effectively rob parents of their basic rights to care for, educate and protect their children. Until people know about the possible threats facing their families, how can they ever feel enough motivation in order to act?

We can also band together as concerned citizens and create political action groups, coalitions and watchdog groups which can work to put pressure on the legislative bodies to reestablish and protect parental rights, as well as to track and block legislation which attempts to steal our rights to parent our children.

Families are the building blocks of societies. Where there are healthy, strong families there are healthy and strong societies. This has been proven out by history. Most historians agree that the Greek and Roman empires collapsed from within, and it was no coincidence that the deterioration and destruction of the family unit ran concurrent to the decline and fall of those empires. There are strong parallels between what happened then and what is happening now within the U.S. There are major entities at work in our time and in our society which seek to fragment and destroy the family and, thereby, hope to enslave all. Let's fight together to strengthen and protect our families now because the clock is ticking.