Hip Hop & Freemasonry: Culture Creation & The Shape of Things To Come

this EXCELLENT video is narrated by a friend and fellow escapee from prisonplanet.tv named prentice reid. this is an amazing documentary, and a MUST SEE!

part one



part two



part three



part four



part five



part six



part seven



part eight

The Wizard of Oswald, Part III: The Dawning of the Self-Policed State

'The Sun Also Rises' on a World of Political Correctness, Invasion of Privacy, Rightism, and Leftism...
Brandon Dean
Thus Always to Tyrants
August 22nd, 2008

Political Correctness and the Soft-bellied Confusionists

Political correctness is possibly the most debilitating social epidemic in America today. It can cause one to literally deny the truth in front of his face, and to even hate oneself...
I had to go to a courthouse in Los Angeles yesterday, and an incident there provoked this writing. A friend of mine gave me a ride to the Van Nuys Courthouse, and we parked down the street a little after attempting to park in a CITY parking lot (which insanely cost 3 dollars for every twenty minutes, not to exceed 20 dollars... Wow, what a deal!) We backed out of the parking lot and parked at a meter directly in front of the lot for twenty five cents. The parking lot was empty. Gee... Maybe they should lower the price so people will actually park there. But we all know government cannot LOWER prices of any kind for any reason, due of course to the inflation created by their failed policies...
Anyhow, as we parked, we noticed two Hispanic women, both in their mid-twenties, arguing in a car across the street. They were screaming at each other, and the first thing I saw was the passenger throw the driver's keys onto the street. Further screaming ensued, while I told my friend to enjoy the show as I headed toward the courts. As I was walking away, I heard one of the women scream "you better let my baby go" about four or five times. I stopped and looked over. The two women were standing outside the car, with a small child inside. The child was obviously in no danger, and the two women looked like sisters having a normal argument that was perhaps a little crazy, but not violent. They were certainly embarrassing themselves acting like children, but I decided it was none of my business, and continued on my way.
My friend however--let's call her Ms. X--was waiting in the car for me, and was basically stuck with a front row seat. As I was walking away, a red sedan pulled up and stopped next to the two womens' car. In it was a middle aged woman and her two adolescent kids. I noticed the lady get out of the car and head toward the "situation," but I kept walking.
After I was done in court, when I came back to the car, Ms. X told me the story I missed. Apparently, the lady who pulled up and parked got out of her car and started screaming at the two arguing women in a bizarre attempt to "settle" the situation. Both women who had originally been arguing turned their anger towards the stranger, who began calling them motherfuckers and cunts and all that. The screaming continued for a minute or two, then Ms. X felt the need to get out of her car and diffuse the situation herself.
Ms. X crossed the street, and calmly mediated the situation by asking the newcomer how she was going to calm the whole thing down by screaming and further inflaming it. This started a whole new barrage of profanities from the crazy lady (who also had kids in her car), this time directed at Ms. X. She kept saying things like "you have no right to interfere" to Ms. X, when she herself had interfered! She demanded that her two children use their cell phones to call the police (there was a police station about two hundred yards from the incident...). She finally got on one of the phones and called someone, describing Ms. X as a "bitch" who interfered and screwed up "her" situation. Crazy, right?
Well, Ms. X did calm the situation, the two apparent sisters thanked her, and they went about their day... The crazy lady could not live with the fact that she couldn't diffuse the situation, yet this new "bitch" (Ms. X) could. None of the parties involved could understand why this lady was so concerned. She really seemed in need of help herself. Then the truth finally came out.
While arguing with Ms. X, she proclaimed the reason she had a right to interfere in these two people's lives: she was a SOCIAL WORKER who worked with children!!! hahaha Amazing! There are so many things wrong with that I don't know where to begin.
But let's start with the politically correct dreamworld this person lives in. She actually not only views it as her responsibility, but her "right" as a social worker, to interfere in someone's life if she feels a child is in danger. First of all, there is no legal precedent for a stupid social worker to use any police powers WHATSOEVER. Second of all, no child was being abused. People argue every god damn day, even in front of children (oh my GOD!!). Did she think the police were going to show up and throw these two women in jail for yelling at each other? She really did!!! Literally amazing...
Years of politically correct brainwashing have led this lady to the ridiculous conclusion that any adults screaming at each other in the presence of a child are abusing that child. Even more ridiculous is the fact that she made the situation FAR worse by interfering, cursing, screaming and threatening than the two women ever would have. The ironic and funny thing is that, when I got down to the court building, there was a sheriff's deputy watching the whole event from about a hundred yards away. So while this idiot has her kids on the phone to 911, pleading with passers-by to hang up their phones and also call the police (!!!!!), there is a cop right down the street who obviously saw the whole thing, and decided like me it was none of his business. And it wasn't...

It may be uncouth, unappealing, and moronic to scream at your sister in public, but there is no law against it, even if-GOD FORBID!!--there's a small child in attendance. Only the war against the American middle class can explain this social behavior called political correctness.

The self policed state rears its ugly head in many ways. By means of example, the once dominant race in this country (white protestants) has been mainly reduced to soft-bellied confusionists who vote against and even believe contrary to their own best interests out of self-guilt...

Manufactured Racism: the Catalyst for a Race War

I grew up learning all about how my white-skinned ancestors abused and killed the African slaves who were brought here by my ancestors against their will. I wasn't told that the white slave trade was just as prevalent as the black slave trade until the invention of the cotton gin. And I also wasn't told that an Irish slave was worth a tenth of the price of an African slave, and that was the real reason the South chose African slaves: they were simply bigger, stronger, and more compliant. The Irish slave was not only smaller and weaker, but he organized with his fellow Irishmen to break out or revolt, and would, at every opportunity, malign his "owner."
Simple economics. The African slaves could be (generally) trusted not to rebel. The Irish could not. Not to mention it was a whole lot easier to find a black slave amid a white population than an Irish...
I was also never told that there were BLACK SLAVE OWNERS from the South, and not just a few of them. They certainly were not the majority, but they also certainly existed. Not only that, but where did all the African slaves come from in the first place? Africans sold them to the white slave merchants, who transported them across the Atlantic. They were treated like no better animals by their fellow black African slave traders than by the European slave traders. I'm terribly sorry if this does not fit your "view" of history, but it's the simple truth. Go read any book on the subject. Shit, go watch "Roots."
So. growing up hearing about "my people" oppressing "their people," it surprised me to look back on my childhood, and realize something entirely disturbing: I have been called a "honky," "cracker," "gringo"-and any other number of anti-white racial epithets-so many times as a child, that I STARTED TO ALMOST BELIEVE IT. My people must be evil... We must have something wrong with us to always treat people like this... It seemed to all be the White Man's fault... The exact defeatist attitude experienced by the blacks of the South from years and years of institutionalized racism had been experienced by me!
In contrast, I have probably heard the word "nigger" used in anger by a white person toward a black person less than a dozen times in my life, and certainly not more than once or twice as a child. But I can promise you there is not one black child in all of Los Angeles of the present generation, who got called "nigger" by whites more times than I've been called "honky" "whiteboy" or "cracker" by blacks. As I grew older, I retaliated against being ridiculed for being white, and many learned never to insult me again. I've always had black friends who have seen the exact thing I am talking about as true. I will probably offend many people just by using the "N" word, but that just makes me laugh. If you can't listen to the sound of a mere word uttered in critical symposium, how could your fight for freedom be anything but baseless and worthless?
I was one of the very very few white kids in my junior high school and high school, and I had to learn to fight. Period. You know why? Because black and Latino gangsters would beat the shit out of me for no reason other than going to school in their neighborhoods. Do I resent them for this? Not at all. In fact, it taught me many imperative facts of life, the most important of which is to defend myself...

Here's the reality of the situation: It is not the blacks who are responsible for this politically correct attitude. They are simply fooled by the same propaganda whites are... In order to destroy the American middle class, the New World Order has decided multiple race wars are necessary. They've already started the race war between Islam and "the West." In the Middle East, they have multiple race wars (Arabs vs. Jews, Sunni vs. Shiite, Kurd vs. Arab, Arab vs. Arab, Iraq vs. Iran, etc. etc. etc.) and inside the US, they have multiple cold race wars (white vs. black, white vs. Latino, black vs. Latino, etc. etc. etc.).
Race is the easiest dividing line in the world to exploit. People are naturally drawn toward things of like substance to themselves and their aesthetics. Prejudice exists in every human during every moment of their entire lives. You are prejudiced against certain foods, stores, geographies, and of course, people. Why should we attempt to be something we're not? Why would we deny the inherent prejudice in each of us? Is it wrong to prefer one type of human over another, the way you prefer to, let's say, visit one country over another? Why in the HELL are we so afraid to fucking OFFEND people?!?! I could personally give a rat's ass what color someone's skin is-I've met the good and bad of all races living in LA-but I could also care less what someone else's opinion is on the matter. If I offend weak-minded, confused people in the process, so be it...
So one might understand why someone like me would so greatly resent this politically correct atmosphere in which whites are "forbidden" to criticize blacks or other minorities, yet those same minorities are completely free to criticize whites. A sense of shame has been instilled in the urban white male, and an aura of weakness. I can't tell you how many minorities I've surprised by not being a victim. They are used to the white male's submission, so it can be a shock when a white male actually stands up for himself!
Which leads to my point: the only explanation for the marginalization of the white male's pride is political correctness. And the only explanation for political correctness is propaganda. I do believe that if it wasn't for our shit-hole media, blacks and whites would have long ago settled their differences and learned to live in harmony. "You might say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one..."

Right Versus Left: the Stepchild Paradigm

I can state without hesitation that the Left/Right Paradigm is the outstanding idiocy of the human race. There is no activity human beings involve themselves in which takes up so much of their time, without producing one positive thing, as Left/Right politics. All countries are victims of it, yet, like in many important areas, Americans simply take the cake for their supposed tradition, political intellect, and fervor from the Left and the Right.
First of all, there is no "Right" party in this country, and there hasn't been since the Whig Party. End of story. When the Whigs disappeared, the Democrats were simply MORE left than the present "Left" party: the REPUBLICANS! The Republican Party was the original Left party in this country, and their main positions have not changed... Once again: the Democrats were Left of the Left party, which already existed.
To be sure there are conservative-minded Americans, but they have not been truly represented by any major party since the 1820's.
The political Left in this country basically consists of those who feel a sense of guilt over their position of dominance over other countries, social classes, and races. They vote to force others to financially support the poor whom they feel responsible for, and they call it freedom. Perhaps "Leftism" is not the correct term; perhaps "self-guiltism" would be more appropriate...
This is the attitude which allows political correctness to exist. The soft-bellies on the Left are not the creators of political correctness, but simply those who most easily buy into it. When enough people bought into it, it was then possible to cram it down everyone else's throats. Some of us have resisted all along, but many were fooled and many were cowed.
I really don't want to leave the Right out, because Rightist thought is just as responsible for our present social state as Leftist thought, but political correctness is not usually equated with conservative thought. So they're exempt from blame on this issue... but a rather large number of conservative people have been cowed by political correctness...

Rightist thought is responsible, however, for the psychological preparation required for the constantly rising invasion of our privacies we all are experiencing... Enforcing morality is an old tactic of the supposed Right. This of course is the attitude which led to the drug war, and the social revolution of the 1960's. Any moron knows that the more you restrict something, the more attractive it becomes. Restrict sex, and kids will want to have sex... Restrict drugs, and kids will want to have drugs... It seems so simple to me. But it also seems obvious that the powers-that-be would recognize this, and thus it becomes another tier in the war against the American middle class. What better way to destroy the main component of any middle class-a strong sense of family-than to introduce drugs and sexual freedom to the youth? Of course, drug and sexual freedom should exist, but not as the opponent of anything, such as conservative morality. Sexual freedom and conservative morality can work hand in hand, just as it works with liberal morality. There is no need for conflict between the two, yet the Republicans have certainly promoted this conflict...
The main purpose of this Left/Right paradigm is to present an illusory choice, where there is no choice at all. The other side of the mirror may be the opposite of you, but it's still you. And the same may be said of Left/Right politics. They are opposite sides of the same reflection, nothing more...

The Self-Policed State Going the Way of the Dodo

I have noticed a sharp decline in politically correct self-policing in Los Angeles in the last few years. In much the same way a shepherd uses some of the sheep themselves to guide the other sheep, we have mostly been led towards political correctness not by those in power, but by the brainwashed sheep themselves. They bark and bark until you get back in line.
But ten years ago the politically correct fervor was at its highest pitch. It seems to have declined much in the last ten years, much to the chagrin of the New World Order, to be sure... Los Angeles is still a haven of politically correct scum, but more and more people I meet are sick of it.
If I hear one more person spout off about man-made global warming, sourcing Al Gore's propaganda film, I'm really going to try and vomit all over that person. If I hear one more person proudly tell me about their hybrid, or their bio-diesel car, I may just go 5150...
I've offended people with my research into the supposed Jewish "holocaust" even though I'm 1/4 Jewish, and over half of my close friends are Jewish. If one is looked down upon for researching the history of his own people, I pity the future...

copyright Brandon Dean, 2008

The Wizard of Oswald, Chapter II: The Slow War Against the American Middle Class

The Wizard of Oswald, Chapter II: The Slow War Against the American Middle Class
Brandon Dean
Thus Always to Tyrants
6-26-08



Lee Harvey Oswald was an American hero. Not because he killed Kennedy, but because he didn't kill Kennedy... In the three days between the day he was arrested for the murders of Dallas Police officer J.D. Tippit and President John F. Kennedy, and the day he was murdered on live television, Oswald repeatedly proclaimed his innocence at any opportunity. He actually said "I'm just a patsy..."
Now, that's not too amazing or impressive, since any person fighting for their life might say anything to shift blame somewhere else. However, Oswald had a whole life we've never been told about, which is slowly unfolding as the years go by. It turns out, Oswald was cheating on his wife with a young scientist, who worked for the CIA attempting to discover a way to kill Fidel Castro with a cancer virus. She was intimidated into silence until the 90's, when she finally went public.
Two or three days before the assassination of JFK, the last time she ever talked to Oswald, he told his girlfriend that he couldn't get out of the assassination plot-even if he ran, they'd find him and kill him. But, if he stayed, and went through with the plan, there would be one less person firing at Kennedy... Oswald was actually trying to stop the assassination. He also stated there were a couple other agents on his side, who were also trying to stop it. Once he discovered that he wasn't able to stop it, Oswald decided to stick around and not fire at him. It seems he wasn't even in position to fire at Kennedy, though... He was obviously set up.

Oswald was a victim of the war against the middle class in America. He was a young, impressionable man, and he greatly aspired to be a secret agent. He was an ultra-nationalist, a true believer in the American Dream. He trusted those above him to guide his secret life for the betterment of the united States. He was betrayed...

...And so were the rest of us. The Ninjas of the Far East believed "The best poison is the slowest poison." Why? Because the slower the poison, the less likely it is the perpetrator will be caught. A slow poison leaves no trace...
And so it is with a Slow War. The slower the war, the less likely it is anyone can discover the true cause. Such is the case with the Slow War against the American middle class. It began soon after the War for Independence, which ended in 1781. European banksters sent representatives to the united States immediately to lobby legislators to institute a private central bank, which was to be under the control of the European banksters. They got their first bank, with famous politician Alexander Hamilton leading the charge. The public hated the bank, and the congress killed it in 1811. A year later, the British invaded the united States and sacked Washington DC, destroying thousands of original founding documents. Two years later, in 1814, they got their second bank.
In 1828, an unexpected defeat left Andrew Jackson President of the united States. Jackson was greatly and vocally anti-private central bank. His platform to get elected leaned heavily on States' Rights. Once in office, he made it his mission in life to destroy the central Bank of the United States. He succeeded in 1833--the first year of his second term--when congress denied the bank a new charter.
The European banksters simply changed their plans, and decided the easiest way to destroy the American middle class, and hopefully America itself, would be to split the country through civil war. They succeeded in starting a war between the North and South in 1860.
The South was hopelessly caught in a web of political lies and monetary misfortunes; they simply wanted to save their honor, which was kind of hard while the federal government was slamming heavy trade restrictions on Southern exports, destroying their economy. The South had simply had enough. And conversely, Abraham Lincoln--who is certainly deserving of alot of the criticisms he receives in the alternative press--was simply trying to save the Union. He actually publicly stated he could care less about slavery as compared to saving the Union. So the banksters had him killed by a man who actually claimed to represent European banksters...



Since the Civil War didn't destroy the country, the banksters' next plan was to simply enslave the American public through voluntary contract. They introduced a slow poison, which at first only affected newly-"freed" slaves, but gradually engulfed us all. Their slow poison was called the 14th Amendment. It supposedly freed slaves, but in reality, the supposedly freed slaves were forced to apply for licenses and permits to do the things free Americans could do, such as owning a gun, or marrying a white woman (and eventually even a black woman), buying land, running a business, and so forth... So the slaves' ownership was transferred from plantation owners to the government, and therefore those who control the government. All they had to do was sign on the dotted line to transfer their new-found freedom into government hands...

Their next step was the Act of 1871, referred to by "history" as the Ku Klux Klan Act. It was supposed to shut down the operations of organizations like the Klan, but the problem was, the way they planned to do this was by creating a corporation called the United States, and laying out a different letter of law for all federal territories. This created the District of Columbia, and assigned to it a corporate system of law. Coincidentally, the KKK grew to its greatest number and power forty years after this "KKK Act" supposedly "did away" with these miscreants. Interesting, no?


KKK march on Washington DC in 1925, over 50 years after the "KKK Act." There were millions of KKK members who had joined since 1871, swelling their numbers to the largest in history before the FBI finally shut down their power base starting in the 1930's.

The banksters' next success was two-fold: one was the Federal Reserve Act, and the other was the 16th Amendment. The Federal Reserve Act in 1914 finally brought back the private central bank for the first time since 1834, when Andrew Jackson destroyed it. The 16th Amendment introduced the income tax, which, as the Supreme Court has consistently ruled, inferred no new power of taxation to the government. It is simply a word game, enforced through scare tactics, and was never even legally ratified by Congress in the first place!
After that, the banksters decided to start fracturing the world through massive wars, involving many nations. The first was World War I, where many countries were dragged into a seemingly meaningless war, which was actually geared toward destroying the German nation's middle class nationalism. This backfired on them (or did it?), which resulted in World War II. The results of these two massive wars were manifold:

• a massive arms buildup throughout the "first" world.
• the creation of the State of Israel.
  
• the creation of first the League of Nations, and when that failed, the United Nations
• the paradigm of the Cold War
• miscellaneous results, such as enlightening the thinking man, who is now aware of the corruption in national and international government, and of government's collusion with big business.
• cleared the whole of Asia for American commerce, which before had been kept in check by the Japanese
• cleared the whole of Eastern Europe for Soviet terror
  

In the midst of these two wars, the banksters attacked the middle class in America further by inducing the Great Depression. They did this by first collapsing the speculative markets, then by stopping the flow of cash into the country. The actual amount of cash on the streets, so to speak, before 1929 until 1933, fell by thousands of percent. The banksters take cash off the streets by raising interest rates for loans until no one can afford the interest rates, so less and less people are able to take out loans. And when people can't take out loans to cover their previous loans, they end up foreclosing on their present loans. Where does their real property go? That's right--directly into the coffers of the banksters... See where I'm going with this? The banksters, who had the ability to cause a depression through collectively raising interest rates and collapsing the stock markets, had every motive to do it.
In the midst of the Great Depression, President Franklin Roosevelt stabbed the heart of the American people, and stuck the blade as far as he could stick it. He passed a law which forced the American people to sell the government their real asset called gold, for a paper asset called a Federal Reserve Note. Anyone who did not comply faced a 10,000 dollar fine (sorta like a 100,000 dollar fine in today's dollar), and ten years in prison. In a big media parade, he locked up the American people's gold in the newly built Fort Knox. There it supposedly remains, but anyone paying attention knows it's all been used as collateral on the "national debt," which of course came into existence due to the debt-based fractional reserve policies of the Federal Reserve.
And ever since these events, culminating in World War II, the onslaught has been perpetual. We haven't had a rest. There are so many examples of their attacks, that only a partial list will suffice in convincing you of my theory of this Slow War on the middle class. So here is a list of all the fronts in the banksters' war against he American middle class, and this list is incomplete:

• Supposedly mandated vaccinations. When this program began, there was one "mandatory" vaccine. Now, a child is bullied into dozens of vaccines by the time they're sixteen years old.
• The gradual dumbing down of American youth through state-funded education. Compare school tests from the 1950's to those of now. Kids graduate high school today sometimes without being able to read or write.
• Designer Diseases such as ADHD, ADD, Collitis, Leaky Gut Syndrome, etc... These "diseases," which didn't exist fifty years ago, are designed to draw a profit for pharmaceutical companies, and to gradually grind away at the health of Americans.
• Designed Diseases: AIDS was created to target minorities, drug users, gays, and hemophiliacs, has killed millions of people, and is still killing hundreds of thousands of people in Africa a year..
  
• Gun laws: In order to destroy the powerful middle class in this country, our guns must be confiscated. They are achieving this in bits and pieces, through nit-picking legislation at state and federal levels.
• Television. As discussed in The Wizard of Oswald, Chapter I, television psychologically and physically numbs the brain's ability to creatively think for themselves, and promotes the ideas and desires of those who broadcast television, which is tightly restricted and regulated by the government.
• False Flag Terror: Terrorist attacks on our country have been on the rise since the 1960's, when John F. Kennedy was killed by the banksters, who blamed it on Lee Harvey Oswald, who was actually attempting to stop the assassination. These attacks are always aimed at achieving a clandestine goal by banksters.
• Destruction of the Family: this is the most important front in their war. With the unity of the regenerating nuclear family, the destruction of the middle class is impossible. This front incorporates all other fronts, as all other fronts affect the family. In fact, this war could appropriately be referred to as the Slow War on the American Middle Class and the American Family.
  

It's unbelievable. This list is too short, but I don't feel like spending the next week listing everything I can think of, and you probably don't have time to read it all, so for the sake of brevity, I'll end it there.
The Slow War has certainly been ramping up in the last ten years. It took the banksters 75 years to get their central bank back after Jackson took it from them. It took our present government a few weeks to destroy the Bill of Rights after September 11th, 2001. It took the Federal Reserve 57 years to finally get rid of the Gold Standard. It took three years to destroy America's reputation through the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It took ten years of depression to make the Americans fall for World War II. It took Bush stuttering on national television for a couple minutes the night of September 11th, 2001, to get the American people to fall for the present war. See where I'm going?
The intelligence, common sense, currency, health, pride, stature, property, and very identity of the American people are all going down the toilet. It was slow at first, but now the floodgates are open, and the tide is in.



Yet all tides ebb and flow. All diseases come and go, and the banksters are a disease-neither designer nor designed-of the human race. And the human race, if it wishes to survive, must purge this disease using our immune system's white blood cells, better known as the TRUTH.

Watch this ten minute video on the US Corporation to get a better understanding of what's really going on around here:



End, Chapter II

Copyright Brandon Dean 2008